Jump to content

muir

Members
  • Content Count

    3216
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

muir last won the day on September 5

muir had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

965 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

1053 profile views
  1. muir

    The satanic conspiracy

    How The Sabbatian-Frankist Death Cult Runs The World - The David Icke Dot-Connector Videocast
  2. muir

    Trudeau black face

    but you're supposed to believe that those 'social democrats' are working FOR YOU....no.....they don't work for you.....they work for people who pay $100,000 dollars to go to a fancy meal....that's who they work for... Rothschild’s hold $100,000 per head fundraiser for Hillary Clinton https://hangthebankers.com/rothschild-fundraiser-hillary-clinton/ Clinton gets slammed for racially charged joke
  3. I already showed you how they were advancing 'communism' in the form of a centrally controlled government right across europe and in china and in the US but really china is their testbed and they intend to roll out all the technocratic policies in use there across the west. Andrew yang, the presidential candidate wants to bring in social credit scores and universal basic income you've been given lots of examples you just aren't looking at the info tony blair was a social democrat and he took us in to a war that killed over a million iraqis and hilary clinton and obama were social democrats and they took the US into a war in libya that has killed who knows how many people? They are all part of the same con. They don't intend to make society fairer or try to rebalance the applecart of capitalism. They are simply playing a part in a good cop/ bad cop routine in which their main job is to socially engineer the domestic population. All they'll do is make people more dependent on the system which then makes them helpless and the last thing the workers need to be as the elites bring in all their technocracy hardware is helpless because they intend to make labour obsolete. What the workers need is to be self-sufficient the 'social democrats' will seek to disarm the population while declaring a 'climate emergency' so that they can then push through lots of executive orders that will likely culminate in a civil war.
  4. I don't think you are understanding what sutton said at all 'marxist principles' come from exactly the same people who have moulded society into what it is all the terrible things people hate about 'capitalism' have all come from the same satanic cabal that gave us marxism
  5. i'm glad you can see that the green new deal is really an elite trick
  6. i've always thought he was closet gay i would have no problem with it if he was gay but what i'd have a problem with is that he couldn't be honest with people about it i wouldn't be surprised if that is the next scandal to hit trudeau
  7. muir

    Trudeau black face

    one of the corporate socialist elites 'progressive' political puppets is preaching 'social justice' in public while actually mocking black people behind their backs....you don't say? who woulda thunk? are they foolin ya? 'is it workin?''
  8. muir

    White supremacist terrorist thwarted in Norway

    NGO boats are breaching international protocol by not returning migrants to the nearest port when they pick them up at sea instead what is happening is that they are pushed offshore in a dinghy and a distress beacon is activated that draws in the awaiting NGO boat (likely funded by soros or some other similar cabal character) and they then take them all the way across the sea to italy instead of returning them to the nearest port on the north african coast So the NGO boats are acting as a taxi service and it is all ideologically driven
  9. muir

    Parliament should Legislate to Block Prorogation

    so you are saying in a convoluted way that you want parliament to overturn the democratic will of the british people? the referendum was 3 years ago not 30 years ago! Most Britons want Brexit referendum respected, poll reveals, as public ‘just wants uncertainty over’ Camilla Tominey, Associate Editor 10 September 2019 • 10:00pm More than half of British adults believe the result of the 2016 referendum should be respected, and Brexit delivered, says a new poll. Fifty four per cent agree the referendum result should be respected, the survey by ComRes found. Just 25 per cent disagreed and 21 per cent didn’t know. Of those who voted Remain in 2016, more than a third (35 per cent) said they now wanted Brexit delivered. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/09/10/britons-want-brexit-referendum-respected-poll-reveals-public/
  10. its not just a climate crisis they are also speaking of a crisis of capitalism because they want a technocratic overhaul of our economies; they cannot get minorities to agree to this unless they can trick you into believing that they are working for their interests but they are not. The corporate socialist 'progressives' are not working for black people. In fact they mock them behind their backs (see photo of your canadian prime minister below).....they are not working for you or me. they are working for the people who own the corporations...all the social justice stuff is the trojan horse to seduce you into accepting their poisoned chalice...
  11. I just gave you a whole bunch of countries that are all being collectivised under the EU! They are creating the planks of the communist manifesto but the end goal is a technocracy. 'communism' isn't what you think it is. It is an elite run operation funded by the elites
  12. muir

    White supremacist terrorist thwarted in Norway

    I don't even know what you mean there? I am not pushing nationalism. I'm pushing decentralisation down to the man and woman on the street. The forces opposed to that are the ones that want to centralise things which ultimately has to mean world domination. I think we are at a crossroads are the moment where we have two roads available to us. One road is like what they are doing in russia where they are parcelling out land to the public so that everyone can own a plot of land and farm it and grow their own food. Under this model people can work together and pool their resources for example if they can't afford a tractor they can club together into a cooperative and buy one together. Equally in the cities where people might lack expertise they can pool their knowledge into community run projects The other path is the path of the trans-national corporations which will move everyone off the land and into high density 'urban zone' mega-cities while the farmland is worked by automated drones and robots and sprayed with mass produced chemicals. People will be banned from straying into those zones designated to food production or mining etc. This is essentially what UN Agenda 2021 is all about So the first option is one that sees people connected to the land and to community while the second one sees humans replaced by machines while disconnected form the land and bottled up into tiny 'smart' appartments in overcrowded cities that are surveillance panopticons The purpose was the freemasons 'great work' to control all of humanity under the authority of the cabal Marranos Everywhere! Christian Kabbalists and the Conquest of the New World Submitted by David Livingstone on Fri, 03/02/2018 - 15:00 Crypto-Judaism The Spanish Inquisition and the Expulsion from Spain in 1492, were some of the most pivotal events in modern times. Jewish converts penetrated to Christianity, where they could exact their revenge. Jewish Kabbalists became Christian Kabbalists. When they entered Italy, they fostered the Renaissance, and in Amsterdam, the Northern Renaissance. Luther established Protestantism, creating a schism that permanently removed large sections of Christian Europe from Catholic Control. Rosicrucians cultivated the career of the foremost false prophet and Jewish apostate: Sabbatai Zevi. Leaving from the Netherlands, these secret Rosicrucians, known to American history as the “Pilgrims”, set sail for the New World via England, where they hoped to found a nxew Masonic experiment, known as The New Atlantis. In 1290, King Edward issued a decree to have all Jews expelled from England. All the crowned heads of Europe then followed his example. France expelled the Jews in 1306. In 1348 Saxony followed suit. In 1360 Hungary, in 1370 Belgium, in 1380 Slovakia, in 1420 Austria, in 1444 the Netherlands. As in other parts of Europe, violent persecution had been growing in Spain and Portugal, where in 1391, hundreds of thousands of Jews had been forced to convert to Catholicism. Publicly, the Jewish converts known as Marranos, and also as Conversos, were Christians but secretly they continued to practice Judaism. While secret conversion of Jews to another religion during the Spanish inquisition is the most known example, as Rabbi Joachim Prinz explained in The Secret Jews, “Jewish existence in disguise predates the Inquisition by more than a thousand years.”[1] There were also the examples of the first Gnostic sects, which comprised of Merkabah mystics who entered Christianity. Likewise, in the seventh century, the Quran advised the early Muslim community, “And a faction of the People of the Scripture say [to each other], "Believe in that which was revealed to the believers at the beginning of the day and reject it at its end that perhaps they will abandon their religion."[2] As demonstrated by Louis I. Newman in Jewish Influences on Christian Reform Movements, a similar tendency can be attributed to the advent of Catharism and eventually to Protestantism and other Christian heresies. The Cathars, also known as the Albigensians, were a Gnostic sect of the thirteenth century who worshipped Lucifer. Their influence extended to the legends of the Holy Grail, by way of the Templars, and thereby to Rosicrucianism and Freemasonsy. In his denunciation the heresy, Adversus Albigenses, Lucas of Tuy, a Spanish monk, noted: read on here http://www.conspiracyschool.com/blog/marranos-everywhere-christian-kabbalists-and-conquest-new-world No the elites are telling us that it is about undermining national homogenity. Also it is not economically sustainable because automation is going to strip jobs so there is no economic argument for mass immigration The UN says in its own website that there needs to be 'replacement migration' in target countries. it is all part of the same process of enslaving the whole of humanity. It is a conspiracy against humanity but different demographics are dealt with in different ways. Mass migration is one method they are using to disrupt the cohesion of white demographic majority populations but wars and famines and colour revolutions and debt are other methods used by the same cabal against the global population yes they are...they are orchestrating THOSE WARS 'europe' didn't create the problem. A cabal of satanic psychopaths did no the guy was a trilateral commission member and the UN migration chief and of course an ex goldman sachs man and a bilderberger. His job is to push multiculturalism as a way to water down national cohesion in nation states that the trilateral commission wishes to absorb into their european union (centralisation of power) there is no growth to be had in paying for unemployed people: Migrant crisis to cost Germany €50 billion by 2017 The migrant crisis that has engulfed Germany will cost the country €50 billion within two years, report claims https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/12135244/Migrant-crisis-to-cost-Germany-50-billion-by-2017.html no what i'm doing is pointing out the logical implications of your arguments You argue that 'white supremacy' is when white people form the demographic majority in a country. You don't argue against elite supremacy. You are not complaining that we are all being screwed over by a cabal of satanic pedophiles who have created rapacious corporate monsters that are rampaging all over the world exploiting the workers and their national resources No what you complain about is that there are some countries in the world where white people form a demographic majority. This implies that the problem in the world is that there are too many white people. But there are many countries with black demographic majorities and brown demographic majorities and yellow demographic majorities and yet i don't hear you accusing them of 'supremacism' so your arguments and your language is flawed and is not going to the core problem which is that there is a network of satanic pedos operating through a global network of secret societies who are controlling the worlds banks, corporations and by extensions many of the worlds governments
  13. muir

    White supremacist terrorist thwarted in Norway

    yes and no i think what they are doing is much deeper than diluting nationalism but i think diluting localised forms of identity are part of the process So for example my country scotland is a perfect case study. Although there is a nation: 'scotland' it was never really one unified people. Scotland was always split between a gaelic highland and island culture and a more anglicised lowland culture. The mercantile forces centred in london that were behind colonialism hated the gaelic speaking culture of the highlands and islands and actively genocided it and drove the people off the land and depopulated the highlands and islands. they followed this up by destroying the highland economy by driving the livestock out of the highlands creating famine which was exacerbated by the changes in land law that saw people shunted off their ancestral lands. To escape starvation and in order to be allowed to maintain their highland clothes, musical instruments and martial culture some who had not been deported or killed agreed to 'take the kings shilling' and join the british army. They were then used as cannon fodder around the world which culminated in them being used in two industrialised wars of slaughter known as the 'world wars' in which more scots were proportionately killed than english, i suggest because they were used as cannon fodder That same process that was executed against that target population has also been carried out against other target populations around the world in what is now called 'colonialisation'. In fact many subjugated people adapted by joining the british army eg gurkhas, indian sepoys, sihks, african, fijian etc. meanwhile freemasonic lodges were set up in the colonised lands and crown agents of all skin colours were recruited for example the chinese 'triad' gangs were created as distributors for the freemasons opium that they were mass producing in india and then forcing on the nationalist chinese government through 'gunboat diplomacy' Now before we go blaming 'the english' for this we have ti understand that the same process outlined above was also carried out against the english and of course the vanquished people absorbed into the army. The anglo saxons were invaded by the normans in 1066 who brought in jews to act as administrators and to set up a taxation system. What I'm saying is that the new elite that came in at that time who then created the 'fuedal' system of land control were part of a qabalistic network of occultists that existed in frankia at that time. That network later created the knights templar and the 'city of london' banking district. the templars were the worlds first trans-national corporation and they were a banking power house. Contrary to orthodox historical opinion the templars were not shut down. The city of london became one of their centres of power from which they extended their global power through which they have sought to constantly centralise power I'll give you a random example of their process at work. In 1284 an act of parliament banned individual households from using their own hand querns to grind their grain into meal. This forced people to use the local mill thereby centralising the processing of grain. We can skip that process forward to the contents of the bookm 'the merchants of grain' written in the 1970's, i believe' that covered the total monopolisation of the grain industry in the 20th century in the west. Its a process that starts with banning cottage industry and ends with total centralised control of all resources and just as with grain it can be seen with everything including currency that is now controlled through central banks which in turn are centrally controlled through the bank for international settlements
  14. i have answered it you just aren't listening to what i'm saying like vancity i am also saying that the elites are accumulating capital and have captured the state and are using that to create regulatory and tax environments that are beneficial to their mega-corporations I differ from vancity in that he seems to think there is no regulation whereas i think there IS strong regulation by the state but just not against big corporations. Little businesses get drowned in beaurocracy but the big corporations can navigate that through the use of fancy lawyers and specialists so i don't agree that we live in a world without regulation. i just think that the regulation that exists has been created by and for the big corporations So that is the 'capitalism' side of the dialectic. But lets be clear it is not free market capitalism because the state bailed out the banks which could not happen in free markets. Also large monopolies have been formed with state help so that also is not free markets What we have is STATE-capitalism where the people behind the big corporations CONTROL the state and use the state to benefit themselves and to squeeze out competitors. For example monsanto famously gained monopolies on seed production which can only be achieved through the assistance of the state So we when we speak of 'capitalism' we have to understand that what we have is monopoly, STATE-capitalism not free market capitalism The 'communism' wing of the dialectic is not really an aspiration for a state-less state and when it tries to be like that for example the zapatistas in mexico then they will be opposed by the corporate forces. The 'communism' side of the dialectic is really authoritarian, STATE-socialism where we have fabian socialist (change through reform not revolution) politicians euphemistically called 'social democrats' arguing that the state can solve all of our problems and that we need to hand over more and more of our rights and freedoms to the state So we put these two wings together we can see the trick that is being played. The people behind the mega-corporations have captured the state and are using it to increase their control of the wealth and markets while at the same time using the state apparatus to enforce their will against the workers. This synthesis of the two wings of the dialectic finds its perfect expression in the 'technocracy' style of governance which is about micro-managing every aspect of peoples lives through the policing of their energy useage right down to their electric toothbrush This is achieved by making ALL electrical appliances 'smart' and connecting them to 'the cloud' using 5G technology. The corporations create the technology used for this while the state then enforces the control of individual energy use for example through 'social; credit scores' and 'universal basic income' which will be given in the form of a digital currency that can only be accessed through microchips which will in time be injected into peoples bodies
  15. i think you are naive to believe that karl marx was ever really working for the people ''Karl Marx was a member of the League of the Just which later became the Communist League. The group was an off-shoot of the Society of Seasons, which had close ties to the Grand Orient Freemason Lodge of Paris. Frederick Engel was a wealthy German industrialist. [714] Marx and Engel were driven by the philosophies of Freidrich Hegel, whose now infamous Hegelian dialectic put forth a process whereby opposites thesis and antithesis are reconciled into synthesis. Though Hegel’s philosophy was adopted by Marx, it was equally attractive to Adolf Hitler and the Rothschild Business Roundtable that sponsored him. The Roundtable saw in the dialectic a boon to their monopolies by presenting phony communism (antithesis) as bogeyman to capitalism (thesis). The ensuing conflict- the Cold War- produced a huge market for arms and oil which their trusts manufactured. Genuine revolutionary struggle in the Third World could be labeled as a “Soviet communist conspiracy” and more arms could then be sent to depopulate the undesirable poor, dispensing of agitators who threatened Roundtable interests.'' - dean henderson https://hendersonlefthook.wordpress.com/2017/07/30/big-business-bolsheviks/#more-3112
×