Jump to content
muir

Ideas for alternatives

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, muir said:

 

They DID apply it in the second world war during the 'dig for victory' campaign where public spaces were turned over to crop production. Britain can and has had public crop production

 

There are community gardens even within urban spaces. Edinburgh for example has massive amounts of unused ground behind all its tenements and the reason it is often underused is because it is all fenced off into small gardens that then become the property of the flats that they are adjacent to. Those flats are often rented accomodation so no one feels that they can then make any adaptive use of the land. No one in the rented accomodation wants to invest time into land which they may be asked to vacate when their lease expires

 

However if a communal effort could be made then all fences and walls could be removed to create large open public spaces often enclosed by tenements. This could create safe spaces for children to play, for families to relax and where community gardens could be set up. It just takes some initiative and some political will

Hehe. Yes I know that.

I meant home Grown Humans instead of imported ones.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, DECIM said:

Hehe. Yes I know that.

I meant home Grown Humans instead of imported ones.

 

ALL humans can get back to the land. ALL humans have common ground in that they need clean food, clean soil to grow it in, clean water to drink, clean air to breathe, good quality housing and purpose

 

if the production of these things are decentralised then they bring purpose to people who prior to that were battling with a sense of purposelessness in a world where most people feel their work is not vital.

 

Creating the essentials of life is vital work and if it is decentralised then everyone can be involved in it

 

The green new deal asks questions about how to mass produce renewable energy which requires MASSIVE infrastructure builds to move power around but the answer to that is to decentralise the energy production. instead of having a solar farm that produces energy that then needs to be carried along power lines to homes give those individual homes their own renewable energy tech so that they can produce energy on site

 

This empowers the individual, it removes the need to move vast amounts of electricity large distances with all the wastage and electro-smog that creates and it makes the system more robust as people can't hack decentralised sources of energy. Bad actors CAN hack power networks though as we are seeing with the power outages in venezuala but if the power production was decentralised and the food production was decentralised then this would not be possible as you would have to sabotage each individual group rather then take things down at a central point

Edited by muir

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is one way and my own way of creating a sollution and a form of security to ward off the elite mindset and feeding frenzy, in doing things like this it helps stop the flow of my own vital energy reaching those who think I owe them a living.

 

It is available to those who really desire they get to keep the surpluses in the form of savings, I know people might say you can buy what you need cheaply today, but it won't be long before those economies are also stretched and the cheap shop mentality will begin to get expensive.

 

This is a model that can ride the many storm fronts that are coming, all be it very slowly, but once you have lost the ability to reach the levels of self preservation and the alternatives that go with them, one is in a rut that is hard to overcome, and the next less fortunate being will be slaving for the next stage of their program, do not let it be our children that are the cheap laour of tomorrow, we at least owe them the dignity to be clever and free from this venerable madness.

 

https://steemit.com/@shedlife

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

The Cornucopia Institute Issued A Guide To Organic Certifiers: Information Consumers Ought To Know

  Catherine Frompovich
By Catherine J. Frompovich

In March 2019, The Cornucopia Institute produced a 22-page online report “The Gatekeepers of Organic Integrity.”

On page 5, they discuss “hydroponics” as being incompatible with organic principles.  Then, on page 7 “Container Hydroponics” is discussed along with the certifiers allowing them.  Livestock management projects are covered starting at page 9 through 15. Certifiers and imported goods are covered on page 16.  Personally, I find the report’s Conclusion somewhat inconclusive, pardon my saying.

Here is where consumers will find a “Guide to Domestic USDA Accredited Certifiers.”
 
 
March 14, 2019, Cornucopia issued a press release wherein this appeared:
 
[….] the USDA’s poor oversight of federally accredited third-party certifiers has paved the way for illegal output from “factory farms” that now dominate the $50 billion organic market basket. 

[….] 

“You can run but you can’t hide,” said Kastel. “Congress intended this to be a transparent process and we aim to shed sunlight on the cozy relationship between organic scofflaws and the certifiers they are paying.

The graphic below is taken from Cornucopia’s online report.
 

organic-certifiers.jpg

read on here https://www.davidicke.com/article/527921/cornucopia-institute-issued-guide-organic-certifiers-information-consumers-know

 
 
 
Edited by muir

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Texas Bill Would Increase Vaccine Safety, Reject Federal Narrative

By: Davis Taylor|Published on: Apr 8, 2019

AUSTIN, Texas (April 8, 2019) – A bill introduced in the Texas Senate would prohibit vaccines from being administered unless certain safety criteria are met. Passage of the bill would significantly strengthen vaccine safety testing requirements and push back against any future federal vaccine mandates.

Sen. Bob Hall (R) introduced Senate Bill 2350 (SB2350) on March 8. The legislation would only permit a health care provider to administer a vaccine if all of the following criteria are met.

  • The study the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) relied upon for approval of the vaccine evaluated the vaccine against a placebo control group or against another vaccine or substance that the FDA approved based upon a placebo-controlled study;
  • The study relied upon by the FCA for approval of the vaccine evaluated the safety of the vaccine for a sufficient time to identify potential autoimmune, neurological, or chronic health conditions that may arise on or after a year from the vaccine being administered;
  • The vaccine has been evaluated for its potential to cause cancer, mutate genes, affect fertility, cause infertility and cause autism spectrum disorder;
  • The Texas Department of State Health Service has posted on its website disclosure of any known injuries or diseases caused by the vaccine and the rate at which the injuries or diseases have occurred; and
  • The chemical, pharmacological, therapeutic, and adverse effects of the vaccine and the rate of injury of the vaccine when administered with other vaccines, have been studied and verified.

Effect on Federal Policy

After recent comments by former FDA Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb in February of 2019 just prior to his resignation, some believe that federal vaccine mandates are imminent.  According to CNN, Gottlieb said, “f states don’t require more schoolchildren to get vaccinated, the federal government might have to step in.” Gottlieb also reportedly said, “You could mandate certain rules about what is and isn’t permissible when it comes to allowing people to have exemptions.” [1] As discussed below, current vaccine safety testing requirements are far less stringent than most would assume.  Passage of SB 2350 would bolster these requirements and make enforcement of any federal vaccine mandates more difficult.

Number of Recommended Vaccines Steadily Rise Since Removal of Liability

Vaccine mandates are generally based upon the vaccine schedules recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Because vaccines pose a risk of injury or death, liability is associated with them. Many Americans are unaware that the pharmaceutical industry is shielded from liability for harm caused by most vaccines. This unique legal protection was put into place as a result of legislation passed in 1986, after extensive lobbying by the pharmaceutical industry. Manufacturers of other products don’t enjoy this freedom from liability. Due to lack of liability, vaccines are the pharmaceutical industry’s most lucrative product.

The 1986 law also created the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), which is essentially a special system outside of the normal litigation process to hear claims of harm caused by vaccines. Any compensation granted by the NVICP is paid by the public, through a surcharge on vaccines, and not by vaccine manufacturers. To date, over four billion dollars has been paid under this system to compensate for harm caused by vaccines. [2]

Further, although discovery is a right afforded to litigants in most other legal forums, discovery is not permitted in the NVICP process. This protects vaccine manufacturers from having to search for, and produce, relevant information, including damaging information. In cases involving prescription medication, which are heard in other legal forums, information unfavorable to the pharmaceutical industry has come to light through discovery, such as the damaging e-mails which were required to be produced in the Vioxx litigation. [3]

In the absence of pharmaceutical industry liability for most vaccines, the number of vaccines recommended by the industry and the CDC is steadily rising. For example, in 1983, the CDC recommended that children receive 23 doses of seven vaccines. By 2017, the number of vaccines it was recommending rose to 69 doses of 16 vaccines starting on the day of birth to age 18, with 50 doses of 14 vaccines given before age 6. [4] Since 2002, a CDC adult vaccine schedule has also existed. [5] Like with the childhood schedule, the number of recommended vaccines and doses on the adult schedule has continued to rise. Furthermore, there are hundreds of new vaccines in the developmental process and the number of CDC recommended vaccines is expected to continue to rise.

Inadequate Vaccine Safety Testing

Lack of adequate safety testing is a common concern of opponents of mandatory vaccines and SB 2350 addresses this critical issue.

Many Americans believe that vaccines undergo the same safety testing as drugs prior to their approval. However, this is incorrect. In fact, vaccines and drugs are subject to different rules because the FDA has chosen to classify vaccines as “biologics” rather than “drugs.” Drugs are required to undergo multi-year, double-blind inert placebo studies, widely known as the gold standard of safety science, prior to licensing. Vaccines, on the other hand, are not required to undergo inert placebo-controlled studies for approval. [6] Furthermore, unlike the lengthy periods required for drug safety studies, vaccine safety studies monitor for adverse reactions for very short periods of time, often of fourteen days or less. [7] Additionally, although children frequently receive multiple vaccines at the same time in accordance with the CDC’s recommended schedule, vaccine manufacturers are not required to test the safety of the vaccines in these combinations. [8]

In fact, there is a multitude of reasons, in addition to inadequate safety testing, to question the mandating of vaccines. For example, the ingredients in them are often cited as a source of concern. The ingredients in each type of vaccine differ but, generally, vaccines contain a myriad of toxic or concerning substances such as aluminum, antibiotics, formaldehyde, Polysorbate 80, bovine extract, egg protein, monosodium glutamate (MSG), squalene, and aborted human fetal tissue. [9], [10]. Additionally, several recently published books set forth scientific information which raises concerns about vaccines, including the book Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies: 400 Important Scientific Papers Summarized for Parents and Researchers by Neil Z. Miller, which contains over 400 peer-reviewed scientific studies. [11] In another book, Vaccines – A Reappraisal, Dr. Richard Moskowitz, a family physician with over fifty years of experience, discusses a wide range of troubling information concerning vaccines, such as:  epidemiological research which indicates that vaccines may interfere with the normal development of a healthy immune system; information concerning the role that vaccines can play in causing infectious disease outbreaks; and evidence of the surprisingly low effectiveness levels of many vaccines. [12] J.B. Handley’s book How to End the Autism Epidemic also contains a wealth of information concerning potential harm caused by vaccines, particularly focusing on aluminum, a toxic metal used as an adjuvant in many vaccines, and on evidence of a causal link between vaccines and autism. [13] As these works clearly indicate, the science is not settled with regard to whether vaccines are safe or necessary.

State Action Needed

Federal regulation becomes ineffective when states enact contradictory policies. If multiple states ban mandatory vaccinations or pass laws which conflict with the CDC’s recommended schedules, it will become extremely difficult for the federal government to enforce future federal mandates. Such state laws will also undermine the federal narrative and make it harder for the feds to generate support for nationwide mandatory vaccine policies. By passing SB 2350, Texas has the opportunity to lead on this important issue and to become the potential standard bearer for resisting federal vaccine policy at the state level.

WHAT’S NEXT

NOTES

[1] Cohen, Elizabeth and Bonifeld, John, “FDA chief: Federal government might step in if states don’t change lax vaccine laws.”  CNN.com. Cable News Network. Web. 20 Feb 2019, https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/20/health/vaccine-exemptions-fda-gottlieb/index.html.  Accessed 7 April 2019.

[2] Children’s Health Defense. “$4 Billion and Growing:  U.S. Payouts for Vaccine Injury and Deaths Keep Climbing.” www.ChildrensHealthDefense.org. Web. 19 Nov. 2018,   https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/4-billion-and-growing-u-s-payouts-for-vaccine-injuries-and-deaths-keep-climbing/. Accessed 7 April 2019.

[3] Berensen, Alex, “Jury Finds Merck Liable in Vioxx Death and Awards $253 Million.”  nytimes.com. Web. 19 Aug. 2005, https://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/19/business/jury-finds-merck-liable-in-vioxx-death-and-awards-253-million.html. Accessed 7 April 2019.

[4] National Vaccine Information Center. “A Guide to Reforming Vaccine Policy and Law.” www.nvic.org. Web. 26 Sept. 2018, https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements/Reforming-Vaccine-Policy—Law-Guide.aspx. Accessed 7 April 2019.

[5] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Immunization Schedules, Table 1. Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule for ages 19 years or older, United States, 2019. Web. 5 Feb. 2019, https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/adult.html. Accessed 7 April 2019.

[6] Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. “Vaccines and the Liberal Mind.” Children’s Health Defense. www.ChildrensHealthDefense.org. Web. 14 June 2018, https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/vaccines-and-the-liberal-mind/. Accessed 7 April 2019.

[7] Moskowitz, Richard, Vaccines – A Reappraisal. New York, New York: Skyhorse Publishing, 2017. 31-42. Print.

[8] Imus, Deirdre.  “Toxic Vaccine Ingredients:  The Devil is in the Details.”  www.ChildrensHealthDefense.org. Web. 6 March 2018, https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/toxic-vaccine-ingredients-the-devils-in-the-details/. Accessed 7 April 2019.

[9] Ibid

[10] National Vaccine Information Center. “New Human Fetal Cell Lines Available for Vaccine Production.”  www.nvic.org. Web. 15 Jan. 2018, https://www.nvic.org/nvic-vaccine-news/january-2018/new-human-fetal-cell-lines-for-vaccine-production.aspx. Accessed 7 April 2019.

[11] Miller, Neil Z., Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies: 400 Important Scientific Papers Summarized for Parents and Researchers, Santa Fe, New Mexico: New Altantean Press, 2016. Print.

[12] Moskowitz, Richard, Vaccines – A Reappraisal. New York, New York: Skyhorse Publishing, 2017. Print.

[13] Handley, J.B., How to End the Autism Epidemic. White River Junction, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2018. Print.

https://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2019/04/texas-bill-would-increase-vaccine-safety-reject-federal-narrative/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Revive anti-trust!

 

Robert Reich: The Monopolization of America

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/24/2019 at 12:18 PM, muir said:

The Cornucopia Institute Issued A Guide To Organic Certifiers: Information Consumers Ought To Know

  Catherine Frompovich
By Catherine J. Frompovich

In March 2019, The Cornucopia Institute produced a 22-page online report “The Gatekeepers of Organic Integrity.”

On page 5, they discuss “hydroponics” as being incompatible with organic principles.  Then, on page 7 “Container Hydroponics” is discussed along with the certifiers allowing them.  Livestock management projects are covered starting at page 9 through 15. Certifiers and imported goods are covered on page 16.  Personally, I find the report’s Conclusion somewhat inconclusive, pardon my saying.

Here is where consumers will find a “Guide to Domestic USDA Accredited Certifiers.”
 
 
March 14, 2019, Cornucopia issued a press release wherein this appeared:
 
[….] the USDA’s poor oversight of federally accredited third-party certifiers has paved the way for illegal output from “factory farms” that now dominate the $50 billion organic market basket. 

[….] 

“You can run but you can’t hide,” said Kastel. “Congress intended this to be a transparent process and we aim to shed sunlight on the cozy relationship between organic scofflaws and the certifiers they are paying.

The graphic below is taken from Cornucopia’s online report.
 

organic-certifiers.jpg

read on here https://www.davidicke.com/article/527921/cornucopia-institute-issued-guide-organic-certifiers-information-consumers-know

 
 
 

 

I have worked on some of our local factory units when I was younger, I have seen the industry change myself, from our humble beginnings as a man from the land.

 

There are many unseen horrors within these factory farms, like hoof problems created by the cattle standing in manure for long periods.

 

They do it this way so they can maximize milk yields as the animals don't have to walk larger distances to the fields using up bodily energy.

 

They have bulls running with the cows so they can catch them to keep them in calf for their whole adult lives.

 

Now the cows can choose when to be milked by auto units where the cows can go at their leisure and be milked.

 

The whole system is unatural and detrimental to the animals who are discarded the second they fail to produce.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, David Stevenson said:

 

I have worked on some of our local factory units when I was younger, I have seen the industry change myself, from our humble beginnings as a man from the land.

 

There are many unseen horrors within these factory farms, like hoof problems created by the cattle standing in manure for long periods.

 

They do it this way so they can maximize milk yields as the animals don't have to walk larger distances to the fields using up bodily energy.

 

They have bulls running with the cows so they can catch them to keep them in calf for their whole adult lives.

 

Now the cows can choose when to be milked by auto units where the cows can go at their leisure and be milked.

 

The whole system is unatural and detrimental to the animals who are discarded the second they fail to produce.

 

and because the cows are under those pressures their udders develop sores and become infected so the cows are then given antibiotics that then get into the milk contributing to the problem of the lessening effectiveness of antibiotics in fighting infection among humans

 

I suppose when each house had their own cow the calf was not seperated from the mother and the family only took what they needed. Goats could also supplement the milk requirements

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, muir said:

 

and because the cows are under those pressures their udders develop sores and become infected so the cows are then given antibiotics that then get into the milk contributing to the problem of the lessening effectiveness of antibiotics in fighting infection among humans

 

I suppose when each house had their own cow the calf was not seperated from the mother and the family only took what they needed. Goats could also supplement the milk requirements

 

If any of the cows got mastitis in the larger factory farm I worked we would only milk the uneffected quarters, however the treatment is still in the animals, immune and endocrine systems and as you say enters the food chain, this the larger units simply could not cope with if done the old way.

 

Raw milk that has been pasturised and not homogenized is far safer to consume, it never ever effected us and is nectar compared to today's rubbish.

 

Goats and sheeps milk is far better suited for human consumption because the balance factors between a human child and their offspring are similar in size when new born, and the milk consistency similar too.

Edited by David Stevenson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, David Stevenson said:

Raw milk that has been pasturised and not homogenized is far safer to consume, it never ever effected us and is nectar compared to today's rubbish.

 

doesn't pasteurisation denature the proteins though?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, muir said:

 

doesn't pasteurisation denature the proteins though?

 

It does alter it but you cannot sell it to the public unless it is treated, we used to get it straight from the bulk tank every morning and consume it withing the day, the cream floating on the top before stirring it up before the tanker comes is great of your porridge though, whenever we few the cows turnips and other substitutes you could taste it in the milk the next day, kale was especially good.

 

A neighbour had a herd of Jersey's their milk was pure nectar, and the cream the best i have eaten.

Edited by David Stevenson
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, David Stevenson said:

 

It does alter it but you cannot sell it to the public unless it is treated, we used to get it straight from the bulk tank every morning and consume it withing the day, the cream floating on the top before stirring it up before the tanker comes is great of your porridge though, whenever we few the cows turnips and other substitutes you could taste it in the milk the next day, kale was especially good.

 

A neighbour had a herd of Jersey's their milk was pure nectar, and the cream the best i have eaten.

 

I had good buffalo milk in india!

 

I know that legally you have to pasteurise milk in the UK but who knows maybe there is an underground raw milk movement in the countryside

 

You can however buy cheese in the UK made from unpasteurised milk

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, muir said:

 

I had good buffalo milk in india!

 

I know that legally you have to pasteurise milk in the UK but who knows maybe there is an underground raw milk movement in the countryside

 

You can however buy cheese in the UK made from unpasteurised milk

 

 

 

Yes there is an underground network, the farmers who consume their own milk before it goes off to be treated and anyone who works for them too, it will be many hundreds of thousands probably, cheese goes through the curing process so it is exempt from legislation, but which countries I am not sure.

 

In the days of the yeoman farmer they knew their stock family tree better than we know our own ancestry today, they were the best record keepers, and still could be today if they used the labs properly for testing.

 

Everything could return to normality if wesimply looked over the next hill and ceased thinking we are mearly there to serve the Varroa.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FOIA Request Template For Presentation To A City Council, Zoning Board Or Local Authority Regarding 5G+ Technology Implementation

By Catherine J Frompovich

 

Many cities have been successful in preventing 5G from ‘frying’ them.  See Some Northern California Cities Are Blocking Deployment of 5G Towers.

Below is a template FOIA Request a consumer used in her area to file a comprehensive 5G FOIA request. Correspondingly, concerned consumers can present it to proper local authorities to let them know “you mean business” about NO 5G in my back yard!

FOIA Request Template

This is a request for information per the Freedom of Information Act concerning the plans, if any, that you may have implemented concerning 5G Technology, the Smart Grid, replacement of telephone poles and LED lighting (see 1.11) and anything that may indicate you plan on facilitating [name your area] as a “smart city.”

1.1 Do you have a 5G strategy?

If yes, I request to see the complete strategy, its ambitions and its objectives in a Word, PDF or picture format.

1.2 If yes, has the council published or provided to the public the opportunity to read and understand the City Council’s plan as it concerns 5G Strategy; was the replacement telephone poles with LED lighting part of the 5G strategy; has the public been informed of the benefits and/or risks involved in installing it, and been given the opportunity for public input? Where was this information published, and if, where?

1.3 I also request any document that you have received from any source (such as, but not limited to FEDA, Federal government, State government, 5G network installers, etc.) including the highest level of detail on all 5G technology that’s planned to be used and/or currently in use (LED street lights 1.11) in public spaces within the city limits of [your area] including the following information:

(a) Companies and entities involved and the names of the company/entity officers.

(b) Specification sheets of all 5G technology.

(c) What technology, e.g., units and arrays are not currently 5G, but can be 5G enabled, e.g., with current software, future software, hardware upgrades or retrofitting?

(d) What U.S. and International safety standards are those of the City Council complying with for the 5G strategy and existing 5G technology?

(e) I request proof, e.g., a certificate from City Council, which confirms U.S. and International safety standards for workers and the public have been met.

1.4 I request all documentation, memos, emails and communication on companies and entities you’re in talks with regarding the formulation of a 5G strategy.

1.5 I request the name(s) of the Officer(s) in charge of the 5G strategy and roll out, including their CV and qualifications in 5G and Smart Cities; and who their subject area expert or consultancy is, their CV and qualifications on 5G and Smart Cities.

1.6 Are you in talks with any experts, companies or entities about autonomous vehicles (AV) for public transport and/or private use on Public Highways in my town or elsewhere?

If yes, I request to see the complete strategy, its ambitions and its objectives in a Word, PDF or picture format.

1.7 I also request a supplementary document that includes all levels of detail on:

(a) Companies and entities involved and the names of the company/entity officers?

(b) Specification sheets of all technology.

(c) What type of communication system will those of the City Council be utilizing to control the vehicles?

(d) What U.S. and International safety standards does your AV strategy and rollout comply with?

(e) I request proof, e.g., a certificate from City Council, which confirms U.S. and International safety standards for workers and the public have been met.

1.8 If no, I request all documentation, memos, emails and communication on companies and entities you’re in talks with regarding the formulations of an autonomous public and private vehicle technology strategy.

1.9 Do you have a strategy for smart roads and smart signage on Public Highways and Public spaces?

If yes, I request to see the complete strategy, its ambitions and its objectives in a Word, PDF or picture format.

1.10 I also request a supplementary document that includes all levels of detail on:

(a) Companies and entities involved and the names of the company/entity officers?

(b) Specification sheets of all technology.

(c) What technology, e.g., units and arrays, will not be 5G, but can be 5G enabled, e.g., with current software, future software, hardware upgrades or retrofitting etc., and please, could you must be specific on anything here?

(d) What U.S. and International safety standards does your 5G strategy and rollout comply with?

(e) I request proof, e.g., a certificate from the City Council, which confirms U.S. and International safety standards for workers and the public have been met.

1.11 If no, I request all documentation, memos, emails and communication on companies and entities you’re in talks with regarding smart roads and smart signage. Are you planning, or have already implemented, an LED street lighting system rolled out?

1.12 If yes, please answer these questions:

(a) What are the CMS [Central Management Systems] and specification of the software and hardware of the LED street light system?

b) What type of waveform is the LED; e.g., Square wave?

(c) Can you control the Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) of the streetlight system using the CMS?

(d) Can you control the PWM of each streetlight that’s connected to the system?

(e) What restrictions do you have in place for the control of the PWM?

(f) What are the U.
 

 
 
 

S. and International safety limits (low and high) for the amount of “flicker” (Hz) the Human Body and eyes can be exposed to, and for how long?

(g) I request to see the training manual and safety operation manual for the CMS and the LED streetlight system.

(h) Who is the company who is installing, or has installed, the CMS LED streetlight system?

(i) What company maintains and repairs the CMS and LED streetlight system?

(j) What entity or Officer is or will be responsible for monitoring the safety standards for the CMS and LED streetlight system?

(k) I request proof, e.g., a certificate from the City Council, which confirms U.S. and International safety standards for workers and the public have been met.

(l) What is the amount of Blue Light leakage that’s safe for the public and workers during the LED streetlights operation?

(m) What level of LED streetlight exposure is safe for the public at daytime and nighttime?

(n) Is there a legal requirement for diffusers to be fitted to LED streetlights?

(o) How have you have addressed the amount of Oxidative Stress on Human and Animal cells that’s produced from LED?

1.13 If no, then I request a declaration from the City Council that you will not be installing LED streetlights in the future. If you cannot provide a declaration, I would like the following answered in the future tense:

(a) What are the CMS and specification of the software and hardware of the LED street light system?

(b) What type of waveform is the LED, e.g., Square wave?

(c) Can you control the Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) of the streetlight system using the CMS?

d) Can you control the PWM of each street light that’s connected to the system?

(e) What restrictions do you have in place for the control of the PWM?

(f) What are the U.S. and International safety limits (low and high) for the amount of ‘flicker’ (Hz) the Human Body and eyes can be exposed to, and for how long?

(g) I request to see the training manual and safety operation manual for the CMS and the LED streetlight system.

(h) Who is the company who is installing or has installed the CMS LED streetlight system?

(i) What company will maintain and repair the CMS and LED streetlight system?

(j) What entity and Officer is responsible for the safety standards for the CMS and LED streetlight system?

(k) I request proof, e.g., a certificate from City Council, which confirms that U.S. and International safety standards for workers and the public have been met.

(l) What is the amount of Blue Light leakage that’s safe for the public and workers during the LED streetlights operation?

(m) What level of LED streetlight exposure is safe for the public at daytime and nighttime?

(n) Is there a legal requirement for diffusers to be fitted to LED streetlights?

(o) How have you addressed the amount of Oxidative Stress on Human and Animal cells that’s produced from LED?

1.14  I request all memos, presentations, documents, plans, rollouts, emails and details regarding 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G, WiFi (Wireless Fidelity) / LiFi (Light Fidelity) in public spaces.

A hat tip with special thanks to Eileen Dannemann.

The above template, after reading it, suddenly becomes an educational tool for consumers, plus those in local government, who probably never heard from the 5G lobbyists and tech reps about the unknown health issues discussed.

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies.Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

https://www.davidicke.com/article/531965/foia-request-template-presentation-city-council-zoning-board-local-authority-regarding-5g-technology-implementation

 

 
 
 
 
 
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After 14 minutes max starts speaking about how a barrister in australia is challenging the 5G roll out by accusing the telecoms company of 'assault' under criminal law

 

he suggests going to a doctor and getting them to make a statement that the electromagnetic fields you are exposed to by these masts affects your health (which we know from studies it does) and you can point out that the telecoms companies are assaulting you with the EMF's

 

The World is Changing

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

posted in wrong thread

Edited by muir

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

15 May day of protest against 5G...

 

5G Day of Action

We are facing a 5G Crisis.

That’s why Americans for Responsible Technology is planning a nationwide Day of Action on May 15th, calling on wireless companies (Verizon, Sprint, AT&T and T-Mobile) and their sub-contractors (Crown Castle, ExteNet Systems and other antenna installers) to suspend the deployment of small cell wireless antennas in residential neighborhoods until such time as chronic, low level exposure to 5G radio-frequency (RF) microwave radiation can be proven completely safe.

The coordinated events will take place in cities and towns across the country from 12 noon to 1:30 (local time) on Wednesday, May 15th. The purpose of these events is to raise public awareness of the issue through media coverage, and to place the burden of responsibility where it belongs: on those who stand to profit from the deployment of 5G.

While we recognize that there are many troubling aspects to the wireless radiation problem, we are framing this particular event to concentrate on the impact of chronic radiation exposure on children. Children are uniquely vulnerable to environmental exposures –  particularly those which can affect the developing brain and increase the risk of cancer. We believe the instinct to protect children is well understood, and this will help our message resonate with young parents and others in the community who may not yet be familiar with wireless radiation and its potential impacts on human health.

To join a group in your area, please see our groups and events map.

 

Find a protest near you here: https://5gcrisis.com/day-of-action/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How To 5G Proof YOUR HOUSE!!! This Is Next Level EMF PROTECTION!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An alternative is to return back to god/nature, feel the living force in the deep hearts core, when everything else fails us, nature will be waiting for us for salvation,

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to EMFscientist.org

 

The International EMF Scientist Appeal serves as a credible and influential voice from EMF (electromagnetic field) scientists who are urgently calling upon the United Nations and its sub-organizations, the WHO and UNEP, and all U.N. Member States, for greater health protection on EMF exposure.

 

As of January 1, 2019, 247 EMF scientists from 42 nations have signed the Appeal.

 

appeal_button.jpg

 

 

To: His Excellency Antonio Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations;
Honorable Dr. Tedros Adhanom, Director-General of the World Health Organization
Honorable Joyce Msuya, Acting Executive Director of the U.N. Environment Program and Assistant Secretary-General of the U.N.;
U.N. Member Nations

Note: The Appeal was initially submitted on May 11, 2015

 

 

Reader.pngPress Release announcing International EMF Scientist Appeal (May 11, 2015)

 

 

The Appeal is being signed by scientists who have published peer-reviewed papers on the biological or health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields, part of the electromagnetic field (EMF) spectrum that includes extremely low frequency fields (ELF) emitted by electrical devices; and, radiofrequency radiation (RFR), used for wireless communications. Scientists who have published peer- reviewed papers in related fields and have been significantly engaged in EMF education, are recognized as Supporting Scientists.

The Appeal urgently calls upon the United Nations, the WHO, UNEP and the UN Member States to:

  • Address the global public health concerns related to exposure to cell phones, power lines, electrical appliances, wireless devices, wireless utility meters and wireless infrastructure in residential homes, schools, communities and businesses.

The scientific findings identified by the signators and others justify this appeal. The World Health Organization (WHO) is encouraged to exert strong leadership in fostering the development of more protective EMF guidelines, to call for precautionary measures, and to educate the public about health risks, particularly risks posed to children and to normal fetal development. By not taking action, the WHO is failing to fulfil its role as the preeminent international public health agency.

  • The United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) is the U.N.’s “voice for the environment” and is uniquely positioned to take a planetary view of the potential for harm that EMF pollution presents to, biology -- evolution, health, well being, and very survival of all living organisms world-wide.
  • We encourage the U.N. to ask UNEP to evaluate the scientific evidence and initiate an assessment of alternative exposure standards and practices that could substantially lower human exposures to non-ionizing electromagnetic fields.

 

 


The National Toxicology Program (NTP) concluded in two final reports released November 1, 2018, that there is clear evidence that male rats exposed to high levels of radio frequency radiation (RFR), like that used in 2G and 3G cell phones, developed cancerous heart tumors. There was also some evidence of tumors in the brain and adrenal gland of exposed male rats.

For more information, see here.

 

Statement by the Advisors to the International EMF Scientist Appeal August 18, 2017

In addition to the technological advancements that have been transforming the electrical power and telecommunications industry over the last few decades, we are now witnessing a new infrastructure deployment – 5th generation (5G) wireless broadband, and the Internet of Things - that promises to establish a globally connected world. Some parts of 5G will operate at much higher frequencies than before, into the millimetre range. This new infrastructure will be transmitting through the environment with a multitude of low powered micro-sensors (emitters and sensors).

There is scientific evidence to cause concern among independent scientists, that this new infrastructure, on top of existing electrical and wireless infrastructures, will cause more harm to mankind and nature. People who suffer from electrical sensitivity are facing the reality that they may have no place to go that is free from EMF hazards.

New U.N. Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, issued in June 2017, realize that “the human rights of all” are an important aspect to achieving the U.N’s Sustainable Development Goals. These principles hold that business and investment do not come at the cost of human rights, based on the three pillars of “Protect, Respect and Remedy”. The current practice of deploying new technologies, without first completing an investigation to ensure there is no possible harm, violates these principles.

We recommend that, in keeping with the U.N. Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, to “Protect, Respect and Remedy", 5G technologies must be subjected to an independent health and safety assessment before they are launched.

Open the document.

 

 We invite you to view a three-minute video of the late Dr. Martin Blank (1933-2018) announcing the Appeal. Dr. Blank brought over 30 years of experience conducting EMF research at Columbia University and served as president of the Bioelectromagnetics Society. In his own words, Dr. Blank gives a compelling explanation of the global public health crisis we are now facing due to increasing levels of environmental pollution from electrical and wireless infrastructures and devices that are supported by a multitude of EMF sources.

 

Do you want to sign the International EMF Scientist Appeal?

If you are interested in signing the Appeal, we invite you to contact us at [email protected].

  • You are qualified to sign the Appeal as an EMF scientist if you have published peer-reviewed papers in science journals on the biological and health effects of non-ionizing radiation.
  • You are qualified to sign the Appeal as a Supporting Scientist if you have published peer-reviewed papers in a related field and have contributed in a sustained manner to increased understanding about EMF science and the need for more protective policies.
  • Please provide accompanying citations.

Regards,
Elizabeth Kelley, MA
Director, EMFscientist.org

On behalf of Martin Blank, Henry Lai, Magda Havas, Ronald Melnick, Joel Moskowitz, and Annie Sasco ~ Scientific Advisors to the International EMF Scientist Appeal.

To contact us, click here

 

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has."

Margaret Mead

https://emfscientist.org/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Major U.S. brands demand EPA take action to stop pre-harvest spraying of toxic glyphosate on food crops

Friday, May 17, 2019 by: Ethan Huff

Mark your calendars for May 23. For this is the day that a coalition of environmentally-conscious, human health-focused, integrity-driven American food companies is planning to march on Washington, D.C., to demand that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finally take action to stop the pre-harvest spraying of food crops with Monsanto’s toxic glyphosate herbicide.

Stonyfield Organic, One Degree Organic Foods, Ben & Jerry’s, Grandy Oats Real Granolas, PCC Community Markets, Patagonia Provisions, Lundberg Family Farms, MegaFood, and Mom’s Organic Market, and Clif Bar, along with many members of the public, will join one another in solidarity to hand-deliver a petition to the EPA explaining, among other things, that the continued use of glyphosate as a pre-harvest drying agent is massively contaminating America’s food supply with a known cancer-causing chemical.

As announced by Sustainable Pulse, the petition also highlights how the EPA’s outdated stance that glyphosate is “safe” flies in the face of more up-to-date findings by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a division of the World Health Organization (WHO), that glyphosate is a probable human carcinogen.

On May 23 at Freedom Plaza, located just around the corner from EPA headquarters, these food companies and their allies in the fight for health freedom will hold a rally with live music, speakers, and plenty of free samples before marching over to hand-deliver their petition, along with more than 80,000 public comments from members of the public who also support the demands made in the petition.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-05-17-major-brands-demand-epa-take-action-stop-glyphosate.html

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pocketnet - Decentralized Social Network on the Blockchain

 

Pocketnet is a fully decentralized publishing and social platform. Based on the blockchain technology, it runs on a set of computers around the world, not controlled by any single entity.No corporation behind it to take fruits of your labor. All advertising revenue is split equally between node operators and those who publish highly rated content. Your subscribers always see your content, unless they decide to unsubscribe. Pocketnet is self-policed by the platform participants with good reputation. Nobody records your keystrokes, viewing habits or searches. Join The New Peer-To-Peer Internet: Go to Pocketnet.app and join for free now

 

https://pocketnet.app/video

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×