Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
muir

The fake right

Recommended Posts

The truth is antisemitic.

 

Gordis-Main.jpg

 

 

Edited by oddsnsods
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/19/2020 at 12:34 AM, oddsnsods said:

The truth is antisemitic.

'when do we jews notice that israel is insane?'

 

The west is constantly beaten around the head with the holocaust and in fact even britain is going to pay for an expensive holocaust memorial in london when there was no holocaust of jews in britain!!!!!!!!

 

Really it is a psyop of white guilt that is being pushed on western society to seek to emotionally blackmail it into quietly acquiesing to the various planks of the neo-marxist agenda that is socially engineering society towards a totalitarian technocracy

 

Meanwhile many jews support the genocidal state of israel thereby showing a staggering level of hypocrisy as if the jews are the only people who must not learn from the holocaust. The truth is that they are not in anyway morally superior to the germans

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

link between US imperilialism (ie jewish neocons) and the fake-left soros open society institute:

Human Rights Watch Disinformation

By Stephen Lendman, i day ago

In cahoots with its wealthy donors and imperial USA, Human Rights Watch (HRW) operates as a mouthpiece for powerful pro-Western interests.

During the Cold War after its 1978 founding, it served as an anti-Soviet Russia propaganda instrument.

Its executive director Kenneth Roth is a former federal prosecutor. His predecessor Aryeh Neier left to become president of George Soros’ Open Society Institute. 

Communications Director Carrol Bogert served as Newsweek’s editor, correspondent and bureau chief. 

Michael Shifter is a former undemocratic National Endowment for Democracy (NED) official, Suzan Nossel a former State Department official, Miguel Diaz a former CIA analyst.

Other past and present members are former US officials or have ties to sources representing Washington’s geopolitical interests.

In 2010, Soros’ Open Society Foundation announced a $100 million grant to HRW over a 10 year period through 2020.

At the time, it was the foundation’s largest ever grant to an NGO — made to serve Soros’ geopolitical interests.

In its 2020 World Report, HRW falsely accused China of “pos(ing) a global threat to human rights,” calling on the world community to “unite against its” actions.

In cahoots with Washington’s get tough on China policy, Roth accused Beijing of assaulting the international human rights system.

China is at peace with neighboring states, at war with none anywhere, threatening none, working cooperatively with other nations — polar opposite how the US-dominated West and Israel operate.

China’s Global Times asked the following:

“Have people like Roth ever visited Chinese cities and spoken with ordinary Chinese families?” 

“Have they ever been to the shopping malls and streets that have sprung up all over China, and talked with ordinary Chinese people there?” 

“Have they left nightclubs and walked back to the hotel at night in China,” knowing they’d be safe outside in the late evening? 

“Is China’s human rights system the worst in the world?” 

“Are they talking about human rights or the privileges of the very few followers of the US value?”

Since the 1970s, life expectancy, food, shelter, clothing, education, public health services, economic conditions, and overall development improved significantly in China.

In its report on the country, HRW falsely claimed its ruling authorities are using “growing economic clout to silence critics and to carry out the most intense attack on the global system for enforcing human rights since that system began to emerge in the mid-20th century.”

Days earlier, Roth was denied entry into Hong Kong to introduce his report after Beijing accused HRW of supporting months of US-orchestrated violence, vandalism and chaos in city — aiming to weaken China by attacking its soft underbelly.

https://www.davidicke.com/article/562462/human-rights-watch-disinformation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/14/2020 at 4:11 PM, muir said:

anti-semitism

 

Concerning the three abrahamic religions i believe that people in this cult i'm speaking about operate within those religions to disrupt or to try and degrade or to try and control their message.

 

Wow, it is almost like you finally listened to what I have said...lol  Good job!  :))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, muir said:

 

The west is constantly beaten around the head with the holocaust and in fact even britain is going to pay for an expensive holocaust memorial in london when there was no holocaust of jews in britain!!!!!!!!

 

Really it is a psyop of white guilt that is being pushed on western society to seek to emotionally blackmail it into quietly acquiesing to the various planks of the neo-marxist agenda that is socially engineering society towards a totalitarian technocracy

 

Meanwhile many jews support the genocidal state of israel thereby showing a staggering level of hypocrisy as if the jews are the only people who must not learn from the holocaust. The truth is that they are not in anyway morally superior to the germans

 

 

It isn't about white guilt at all, because remember, half of those Jews ARE white and MANY of those Jews are WHITE NATIONALISTS like Steve Miller.  What it is about though, is that those white nationalists Jews are letting the conservatives take the blame for what they are doing by pretending that they are politically aligned AND getting them to back Israel. 

 

Just like I said that the reason that Russian Maria Butina was hanging with the NRA was not to get "ideas" about what to do with gun control in Russia, but to smear the NRA...which she did.  They smear the NRA in the USA, and it will be easier to do the gun grab from US citizens.  

 

Just like all the mass shootings in the USA being done by far right "crazed" individuals..is causing that gun grab to happen.  The far right are using fear to put those people in a frenzy, they go out and shoot a bunch of people, then the left takes the stand of gun control...problem, reaction, solution.  

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Change2 said:

It isn't about white guilt at all, because remember, half of those Jews ARE white and MANY of those Jews are WHITE NATIONALISTS like Steve Miller.  What it is about though, is that those white nationalists Jews are letting the conservatives take the blame for what they are doing by pretending that they are politically aligned AND getting them to back Israel. 

 

Just like I said that the reason that Russian Maria Butina was hanging with the NRA was not to get "ideas" about what to do with gun control in Russia, but to smear the NRA...which she did.  They smear the NRA in the USA, and it will be easier to do the gun grab from US citizens.  

 

Just like all the mass shootings in the USA being done by far right "crazed" individuals..is causing that gun grab to happen.  The far right are using fear to put those people in a frenzy, they go out and shoot a bunch of people, then the left takes the stand of gun control...problem, reaction, solution. 

 

ok i agree with much of what you say here in that the whole gun grab thing is being run as a problem, reaction, solution operation

 

I also agree that there are elements that are hiding behind the conservatives eg the neocons

 

I think the sabbatean cult hide behind all kinds of people for example their manipulation of the 'alt right' allows them to hide behind dissafected white people who the sabbatean authoritarian-left can then decry as 'white supremacists'

 

The part i have an issue with is with jews being nationalists. I think this needs a bit more nuance so if we look at the source of neoconservatism which sought to rally americans behind faux-nationalism we find the jewish philosopher leo strauss who was the mentor to many of the people who became the key 'neocons' and strauss spoke about manipulating people by playing to nationalism and flag waving jingosim etc

 

The real nationalism of the neocons is towards israel (at americas expense)

 

But that is not to fault americans who love their country....it is to fault the cabal who seek to manipulate those people who love their country so that they can harness their vote and their support for their wars of aggression abroad which only benefit the war profiteering cabal owned corporations and the zionist enterprises yinon plan to destabilise the middle east

 

I don't see alt right people as my enemy. I see the people seeking to manipulate the dissatisfaction of alt righters in order to re-direct it into their own schemes as my enemy. This view needs a nuanced understanding of what's going on

 

The same is true of love of country which can also be manipulated but as far as i'm concerned the love of ones country and a desire to see it thrive is not in and of itself a bad thing. The important point is to avoid being manipulated into seeking the advancement of your country at the expense of others for example through wars of aggression

 

Some might see that as a naive view though and might say that you are either in your own empire or the empire of someone else

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, muir said:

The part i have an issue with is with jews being nationalists. I think this needs a bit more nuance so if we look at the source of neoconservatism which sought to rally americans behind faux-nationalism we find the jewish philosopher leo strauss who was the mentor to many of the people who became the key 'neocons' and strauss spoke about manipulating people by playing to nationalism and flag waving jingosim etc

 

I dont see the alt right as my enemies either, but I am positive that they feel differently about me because they have said as such.  I feel that they are being "neo-conned" for lack of a better word.  

This is what I feel spot on about nationalism, whether it is white nationalism or jewish nationalism or what ever other type of nationalism that there is out there...

 “The difference between patriotism and nationalism is that the patriot is proud of his country for what it does, and the nationalist is proud of his country no matter what it does; the first attitude creates a feeling of responsibility, but the second a feeling of blind arrogance that leads to war.” By Sidney J. Harris

 

I think that this blind arrogance is has what has led the USA into SO many wars, that basically had nothing to do with the USA, but it was part of the USA trying to penetrate other countries FOR Israel. The US needs to stop footing the bill for Israel's wars, not only monetarily, but also through using US soldiers as their own.  I personally have no allegiance to a country that has no allegiance to US citizens but has more allegiance so for Israeli citizens.  WHY would I support that? 

 

It was the OT demiurge that drew the lines and borders and went around killing people from other tribes because they didn't WORSHIP him.  Sounds no different from the Kings, prime ministers or presidents of today.   Aren't we better than that now?  Why not live and let live?  (rhetorical questions)  

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Karl Haushofer the man behind Hitler, who along with Rudolph Hess really wrote Mein Kampf & the is the father of Geopolitics.

His father Max Haushofer worked for the Rothschilds.

Max also wrote poems about Jews.."The wandering Jew" & "The eternal Jew."

 

Karl Haushofer the occultist & (((antisemite))) married a rich Jew. Along with his friend Kalergi,  he predicted a "united states of Europe" by 1950.

 

https://www.amazon.com/Handelswissenschaften-Kaufleute-Fabrikanten-Gewerbetreibende-Verkehrsbeamte/dp/1362697761

 

md2484778278.jpg

 

 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't get the fake 'middle ground' too which is essentially corporate liberalism consumerism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/20/2020 at 11:05 PM, oddsnsods said:

Karl Haushofer the man behind Hitler, who along with Rudolph Hess really wrote Mein Kampf & the is the father of Geopolitics.

His father Max Haushofer worked for the Rothschilds.

Max also wrote poems about Jews.."The wandering Jew" & "The eternal Jew."

 

Karl Haushofer the occultist & (((antisemite))) married a rich Jew. Along with his friend Kalergi,  he predicted a "united states of Europe" by 1950.

 

https://www.amazon.com/Handelswissenschaften-Kaufleute-Fabrikanten-Gewerbetreibende-Verkehrsbeamte/dp/1362697761

 

I've been looking for an English translation online, without success.

 

Do you know of one Odds?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/22/2020 at 12:37 PM, Golden Retriever said:

I've been looking for an English translation online, without success.

 

Do you know of one Odds?

 

I have translated it GR, it doesnt say much, just links Max the economist with the Rothschilds.

 

This guy was definitely part of the clique tho.. Crypto or otherwise.

As well as a major economist, poet & artist, he also wrote Scifi & was regarded highly. Very much Social engineer like H.G. Wells.

Nazis used Max Haushofers work for propaganda purposes, like "The eternal Jew." They added an anti semetic edge. No coincidence.

Occultist Karl Haushofer was Hitlers handler for sure.

Hitler never wrote Mein Kampf. Hitler was not an intellectual: "He was a rabble rousing mouthpiece."

 

Quote

Maier-Rothschild, Handbuch der Gesammten Handelswissenschaften Für Altere: Haushofer, Max (1840-1907)
Seller image
Maier-Rothschild, Handbook of Complete Commercial Sciences for Older and Younger Merchants as well as for Manufacturers, Traders, Traffic Officials, Lawyers and Judges / Edited by M. Haushofer. Et al

Google translate

Quote

1899 in Germany. A small group of friends in Munich discusses the rapid development that their country has taken in the past 100 years. Max Haushofer is guiding the reader through a vast panorama of technical, political and social developments that portrays a flourishing society after a hundred years of cleverly applied state socialism.

However, this bloom also shows signs of withering. Tired of the diverse possibilities of political participation and general boredom lead to drug abuse and similar phenomena, strange new diseases appear. In addition, there are blossoms of German politics that can still be easily recognized today.

But crime continues to exist in this future, and multimillionaire Ethel Tank is kidnapped. Her friends will follow the trail to the Ottoman Empire. But all of this is overshadowed by another terrible danger: debris from an alien planet are sighted that are on a collision course with Earth. How will the oversaturated society deal with this impending disaster?

 

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=https://textmulch.de/shop/sf-fantastik/planetenfeuer&prev=search

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Putin in Israel: No Place for a World Leader or Anyone Else

Stephen Lendman

 

Why did Putin agree to meet with unindicted war criminal/indicted civil criminal Netanyahu in Israel for the World Holocaust (Industry) Forum at the Vad Vashem memorial? Why did he come together with a figure involved in committing holocaust high crimes against long-suffering Palestinians? Why is he giving credence and respectability to holocaust distortions, deception, politicization and commercialization of long ago Jewish suffering — what the holocaust industry is all about, a sham Norman Finkelstein exposed! More on this below. Former Israeli foreign minister Abba Eban once remarked that “(t)here’s no business like Shoah business.”

https://www.davidicke.com/article/562802/putin-israel-no-place-world-leader-anyone-else

Putin Calls For A New System Guided By UN Charter... But Is It Possible?

Fri, 01/24/2020
 

Authored by Matthew Ehret via The Strategic Culture Foundation,

Anyone looking with sober eyes upon today’s world and the feeble economic and geopolitical underpinnings holding the system together must accept the fact that a new system WILL be created.

 

This is not an opinion, but a fact. We are moving towards eight billion lives on this globe and the means of productive powers to sustain that growing population (at least in the west) has been permitted to decay terribly over the recent half century while monetary values have grown like a hyperinflationary cancer to unimaginable proportions. Derivatives speculation alone under the deregulated “too big to fail” banking system has resulted in over $1.5 quadrillion in nominal values which have ZERO connection to the real world (GDP globally barely accounts for $80 trillion). Over the past 5 months $415 billion of QE bailouts have been released into the bankrupt banks to prevent a collapse. So, economically it’s foundation of sand.

 
 

Militarily, the west has followed the earlier Roman empire of yesteryear by overextending itself beyond capacity creating situations of global turmoil, death and unbounded resentment at the dominant Anglo American powers controlling NATO and the Military industrial complex. The recent near-war with Iran at the start of 2020 put the world on a fast track towards a nuclear war with Iran’s allies Russia and China.

Culturally, the disconnection from the traditional values that gave western civilization it’s moral fitness to survive and grow has resulted in a post-truth age now spanning over three generations (from the baby boomers to today’s young adults) who have become the most confused class of people in modern history losing all discrimination of “needs” vs “wants”, “right” vs “wrong”, “beauty” vs “ugliness” or even “male” and “female”.

Without ranting on anymore, it suffices to say that this thing is not sustainable.

So the question is not “will we get a new system?” but rather “whom will this new system serve?”

Will this new system serve an oligarchical agenda at the expense of the nations and people of the earth or will it serve the interests of the nations and people of the earth at the expense of the oligarchy?

Putin Revives a Forgotten Vision

President Putin’s January 15 State of the Union was a breath of fresh air for this reason, as the world leader who has closely allied his nation’s destiny to China’s Belt and Road Initiative, laid out a call for a new system to be created by the five largest nuclear powers as common allies under a multi-polar paradigm.

After speaking about Russia’s vision for internal improvements, Putin shifted towards the international arena saying:

“I am convinced that it is high time for a serious and direct discussion about the basic principles of a stable world order and the most acute problems that humanity is facing. It is necessary to show political will, wisdom and courage. The time demands an awareness of our shared responsibility and real actions.”

Calling for Russia, the USA, UK, China and France to organize a new architecture that goes far beyond merely military affairs, Putin stated:

“The founding countries of the United Nations should set an example. It is the five nuclear powers that bear a special responsibility for the conservation and sustainable development of humankind. These five nations should first of all start with measures to remove the prerequisites for a global war and develop updated approaches to ensuring stability on the planet that would fully take into account the political, economic and military aspects of modern international relations.”

Putin’s emphasis that “the United Nations should set an example” is not naïve fantasy, nor “crypto globalist rhetoric” as some of his critics have stated.

Putin knows that the UN has been misused by anti-nation state ideologues for a very long time. He also knows his history better than his critics and is aware that the original mandate of the United Nations was premised upon the defense of the sovereign nation state. Article 2.1 of the charter clearly says: “The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members.”

For readers who are perhaps rightfully cynical that such organizations as the UN could ever play a truly positive role in world affairs, it is important to recall that the UN was never intended to have any unilateral authority over nation states, or military power unto itself when was created in 1945. Its purpose was intended to provide a platform for dialogue where sovereign nation states could harmonize their policies and overcome misunderstanding with the aim of protecting the general welfare of the people of the earth. Articles 1.3-4 state clearly that the UN’s is designed “to achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion and to be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends.”

If the United Nations principles as enunciated in its pre-amble and core articles were to ever be followed (just like America’s own admirable constitution): then wars of aggression and regime change would not be possible. Article 2.4 directly addresses this saying: “All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state”.

These principles stand in stark contrast to the earlier 1919 Round Table/RIIA-orchestrated attempt at a post-national world order under the failed League of Nations which was rightfully put out of its misery by nationalists of the 1920s. FDR’s 1944 vision, as Putin is well aware, was based not on “world government”, but rather upon the concept of a community of sovereign nations collaborating on vast development and infrastructure projects which were intended to be the effect of an “internationalization” of the New Deal that transformed America in the years following the Great Depression. The closest approximation to this spirit in practice in our modern age is found in China’s Belt and Road Initiative.

Thousands of Asian, African and South American engineers and statesmen were invited to visit the USA during the 1930s and early 1940s to study the Tennessee Valley Authority and other great New Deal water, agriculture and energy projects in order to bring those ideas back to their countries as a driver to break out of the shackles of colonialism both politically, culturally and economically. In opposition to FDR, Churchill the unrepentant racist was okay with offering political independence, but never the cultural or economic means to achieve it.

Although the world devolved into an Anglo-American alliance with FDR’s death in 1945, the other Bretton Woods Institutions which were meant to provide international productive credit to those large scale infrastructure projects to end colonialism were taken over by FDR’s enemies who purged the IMF and World Bank of all loyalists to FDR’s international New Deal vision throughout the years of the red scare. Whether these corrupt financing institutions can be brought back to their original intention or whether they must simply be replaced with new lending mechanisms such as the Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank, BRICS New Development Bank or Silk Road Investment Fund remains to be seen.

What is vital to keep in mind is that Putin (just like FDR before him) knows that neither Britain nor Britain’s Deep State loyalists in America can be trusted. Yet, in spite of their mistrust, they both knew that a durable world order could only be accomplished if these forces were reined in under a higher law imposed by the authority of truly sovereign nations, and this is why FDR’s post-war plans involved a USA-Russia-China-UK partnership to provide the impetus to global development initiatives and achieve the goals of the Atlantic Charter. This partnership was sabotaged over FDR’s dead body as the Cold War and Truman Doctrine broke that alliance. The goal of ending colonialism had to wait another 80 years.

At the 2007 Munich Security Conference, Putin had already laid his insight into history clearly on the table when he said:

“This universal, indivisible character of security is expressed as the basic principle that “security for one is security for all”. As Franklin D. Roosevelt said during the first few days that the Second World War was breaking out: “When peace has been broken anywhere, the peace of all countries everywhere is in danger… I consider that the unipolar model is not only unacceptable but also impossible in today’s world. And this is not only because if there was individual leadership in today’s – and precisely in today’s – world, then the military, political and economic resources would not suffice. What is even more important is that the model itself is flawed because at its basis there is and can be no moral foundations for modern civilisation.”

Putin is not naïve to call for the United Nations charter to serve as the guiding light of a new military, political, economic architecture. Nor is he naïve to think that such untrustworthy nations as the USA, UK and France should serve in partnership with Russia and China since Putin knows that it will be Russia and China shaping the terms of the new system and not the collapsing basket-cases of the west whose excess bluff and bluster betrays a losing hand, which is why certain forces have been so desperate to overthrow the poker table over the past few years. The fact that Putin, Xi and their growing allies have not permitted this chaos agenda to unfold has not only driven “end of history” imperialists into rage fits but also gives FDR’s vision for a community of sovereign nation states a second chance at life.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/putin-calls-new-system-guided-un-charter-it-possible

Exhausted central bankers raise the white flag in Davos

24 January 2020 • 1:43pm
 
Global debt levels have reached dangerous extremes and central bankers no longer have the ammunition to counter a financial crisis, a top cast of officials warned in Davos.

Kristalina Georgieva, head of the International Monetary Fund, said there are disturbing signs of an asset bubble and acknowledged that the side-effects of ultra-low interest rates and quantitative easing are becoming more treacherous. 

“When people talk of ‘low for ever’, it sends a chill down my spine. We’re only in January and we have already had a number of risk events,” she said, speaking at the World Economic Forum.

Mrs Georgieva said global debt has mushroomed to $188 trillion

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2020/01/24/exhausted-central-bankers-raise-white-flag-davos/

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/21/2020 at 6:29 PM, Stride said:

Don't get the fake 'middle ground' too which is essentially corporate liberalism consumerism.

 

No corporate neoliberalism is simply CARTELISM and MONOPOLY-capitalism which is the pre-stage before transition to technocracy

 

By grabbing control of all the national assets, wealth and resources the technocratic elites are de facto in control of the game. The next step is for them to simply enshrine that control in law through the use of the state apparatus. This can be achieved through a push for a 'green new deal' transition to a 'new economy' and that new economy will be a centrally controlled technocracy and in order to manufacture the technology required for that new electric society the corporations will need to mine vast amounts of minerals and they will need to carry out deforestation, exploitation of third world peoples and generally ravage the planet....all while claiming they are doing it 'for the envrionment'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been involved with some radical groups in US/UK/Europe in the 80's. And I can tell you these radical groups we're seeing now are not the same people. These radical movements in all western countries today are run by some people with unlimited funds and influence to fulfill their own agenda.

 

 I've worked in both Iran and Israel, and many other countries in the Middle East and North Africa. I found the Iranians/Persians the most civilized and least hostile towards westerners compared to other muslim countries. Israelis are just paranoid af. They think all the gentiles are out to kill them and they need to beat us to it. These people are under an enormous amount of propaganda and indoctrination from birth to the grave on a daily basis, allot more so than in us the US/UK/EU/AU/NZ/CA. So who's running them?

 

And who's running the nationalist populist right, and who's running the radical left antifa/Extinction Rebellion likes, and who's running the jihadi ISIS types? Well behind the right in UK/EU we can see Ezra Levant and Pamela Geller. Rita Katz always has the scope on ISIS. And I can show you many more similar patterns in the US/CA/UK/EU/AU/NZ all the way to the Levant and even the Far East, Russia, South America, everywhere really. You can see these patterns in behind the Far Right, the Far Left, the Jihadis, and even the Jewish/Israeli people. We're all being played

 

So who are the puppet masters?

David Icke's excellent work has brought to light the Sabbatean-Frankists, are they the ones running this shit show, or the Farizees who murdered Jesus, or do we have to go back even further? Joseph in Egypt(Genesis), that was pretty much the blueprint for the central banking scam. Anyone familiar with Banjo Billy's work knows it goes back all the way to Sumeria, Present day Iraq and Syria, the Levant, where both ISIS and Western troops are frantically scrambling to destroy all ancient relics. What are they trying to hide, what is to be seen on those ancient artifacts?

 

 

Edited by 1A.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×