Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
muir

Are we being told the truth about the past?

Recommended Posts

This thread will explore the possibility that our current perception of history has been shaped to conceal something about our past or our origins

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who were the ghost people of Africa? DNA reveals ancient Africans bred with new unknown race of humans just 50,000 years ago

  • The researchers studied the genetic material of 405 people from West Africa 
  • They discovered mystery genetic material, which they have termed 'ghost DNA'
  • It suggests that humans mixed with an unknown group about 50,000 years ago 

By Danyal Hussain and Joe Pinkstone For Mailonline

Published: 00:44, 13 February 2020 | Updated: 12:28, 13 February 2020

An extinct branch of human ancestry has been discovered lurking inside the DNA of modern-day West Africans which evolved around 500,000 years ago. 

Traces of this so-called 'ghost population' were located in modern-day people and did not match the genetic fingerprint of Homo sapiens, Denisovans or Neanderthals. 

Exactly what species the hominids belonged to is unknown, but humans mated with them around 50,000 years ago, researchers discovered.  

No physical evidence — DNA from ancient bones, for example — was found, but a computer model indicates this mysterious species must exist.

Scientists at the University of California in Los Angeles say the unidentified species accounts for up to 19 per cent of the genetic ancestry of four populations in three countries: two from Nigeria, one from Sierra Leone and one from the Gambia.  
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There used to be different types of pigmies, Neanderthals, Cro magnon, and haired species that lived amongst each other at the same time, it was diverse. Also, humans would of been technically "human" with species that had FULL ON SETS of hair, as far as sociology and psychology is concerned even intelligence (that's now dumbed down the modern man is VIA the Age of the Annunaki -- that they are just as smart as an untouched species of haired early relatives not much down the line from Lucy). 

 

As well as Atlantis and Mu. We see after the fall of Atlantis the genetic part of the stream, that HALF, became manipulated. You also hear regards to the first rebellion, how us energy beings were suiciding the bodies of some of the giants and beings the Annunaki had made, automatically. Until they made more simple minded cro magnon that doesn't know its being used, that lovely pineal gland. This is what has happened after the human's fall and the destruction of Atlantis and Mu. 

Edited by MatchaLove

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean considering the fact that we get fed so many lies in the present, the past must be distorted massively.

 

lies.jpg.a4e528fb9aeba48b79bc903e61f2f848.jpg

Edited by EnigmaticWorld

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great thread muir :)!

 

This calls for some input from the late Lloyd Pye who believed in the interventionalist theory for the creation of humankind - that we were genetically engineered as a slave race. He argues against the theory of evolution distinguishing between macro and microevolution. Among the evidence he presents to support his claims include:

  • The fused chromosome 2 making mankind the only primate with 46 chromosomes rather than 48 which all others have (apes and monkeys). He states that it is not possible for chromosome 2 to have fused naturally.
  • Over 4000 genetic disorders.
  • Lack of body hair which he did not consider to provide any evolutionary benefit.
  • Speech capability.
  • Different and lighter bone structure including the feet which are poorly designed compared to our supposed ancestors giving an uneconomical style of walking.

Who better to explain it that the man himself:

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

   What I understand is that there is a history of reptilian beings being victimized here, that is all. As far as history goes in regards to how it is portrayed in schools, it is all edited and sugar coated and ignores certain truths when is seen fit. Don't take any portrayed history as any absolute truth.

Edited by positiveevitisop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No one has ever explained this to me, and all you need is a calculator to see the glaring discrepancy with the figures...

 

We each have 2 parents, 4 grandparents, 8 great grandparents etc.

 

So, 2 x 2 x 2 etc. reveals how many direct ancestors we have in each previous generation.

 

Therefore 37 generations back we each have 137 billion direct ancestors.

 

A generation is 25 years and 25 x 37 generations = 925 years.

 

But 925 years ago, in 1100 AD, the UPPER estimate for the world population is only 320 million. (https://www.ecology.com/population-estimates-year-2050/ )

 

What's going on here?

 

Even accounting for some inter-generational inbreeding, the absurdity of the discrepancy becomes more apparent the further back you go...

 

Extend it back 80 generations or 2000 years to the time of Christ (2 x 2 x 2 repeated 80 times or 2 to the power of 80) and we each have 12089 2581961462 9174706176 direct ancestors! (UPPER estimate for the world population at the time is only 400 million https://www.ecology.com/population-estimates-year-2050/  )

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, size of light said:

No one has ever explained this to me, and all you need is a calculator to see the glaring discrepancy with the figures...

 

We each have 2 parents, 4 grandparents, 8 great grandparents etc.

 

So, 2 x 2 x 2 etc. reveals how many direct ancestors we have in each previous generation.

 

Therefore 37 generations back we each have 137 billion direct ancestors.

 

A generation is 25 years and 25 x 37 generations = 925 years.

 

But 925 years ago, in 1100 AD, the UPPER estimate for the world population is only 320 million. (https://www.ecology.com/population-estimates-year-2050/ )

 

What's going on here?

 

Even accounting for some inter-generational inbreeding, the absurdity of the discrepancy becomes more apparent the further back you go...

 

Extend it back 80 generations or 2000 years to the time of Christ (2 x 2 x 2 repeated 80 times or 2 to the power of 80) and we each have 12089 2581961462 9174706176 direct ancestors! (UPPER estimate for the world population at the time is only 400 million https://www.ecology.com/population-estimates-year-2050/  )

 

 

I have come across this conundrum too when researching my family tree. Apparently everyone with European ancestry is supposed to be descended from Charlemagne and half the population of European men share Tutankhamen's DNA.  An explanation is offered on this link:

 

http://nautil.us/issue/56/perspective/youre-descended-from-royalty-and-so-is-everybody-else

 

  We are all special, which also means that none of us is. This is merely a numbers game. You have two parents, four grandparents, eight great-grandparents, and so on. Each generation back the number of ancestors you have doubles. But this ancestral expansion is not borne back ceaselessly into the past. If it were, your family tree when Charlemagne was Le Grand Fromage would harbor around 137,438,953,472 individuals on it—more people than were alive then, now, or in total. What this means is that pedigrees begin to fold in on themselves a few generations back, and become less arboreal, and more a mesh or weblike. You can be, and in fact are, descended from the same individual many times over. Your great-great-great-great-great-grandmother might hold that position in your family tree twice, or many times, as her lines of descent branch out from her, but collapse onto you. The further back through time we go, the more these lines will coalesce on fewer individuals. “Pedigree” is a word derived from the middle French phrase “

pied de grue”—the crane’s foot—as the digits and hallux spread from a single joint at the bottom of the tibia, roughly equivalent to our ankle. This branching describes one or a few generations of a family tree, but it’s wholly inaccurate as we climb upward into the past. Rather, each person can act as a node into whom the genetic past flows, and from whom the future spills out, if indeed they left descendants at all.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

I have come across this conundrum too when researching my family tree. Apparently everyone with European ancestry is supposed to be descended from Charlemagne and half the population of European men share Tutankhamen's DNA.  An explanation is offered on this link:

 

http://nautil.us/issue/56/perspective/youre-descended-from-royalty-and-so-is-everybody-else

 

Thanks for this, it finally explains it for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/14/2020 at 3:58 PM, EnigmaticWorld said:

I mean considering the fact that we get fed so many lies in the present, the past must be distorted massively.

i would add

 

"history is written by the victors"

 

(especialy when you take into account the current human behaviour and psyche )

C6A5B691-1A70-48AC-B2C4-4D12FCF43667.jpeg

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe Humans were never supposed to be on Earth,

Either we were put here as a punishment for past missdeeds on another planet. 

Or we could of been saved by moving Humans to Earth to protect us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/14/2020 at 6:25 PM, Mitochondrial Eve said:

Great thread muir :)!

 

This calls for some input from the late Lloyd Pye who believed in the interventionalist theory for the creation of humankind - that we were genetically engineered as a slave race. He argues against the theory of evolution distinguishing between macro and microevolution. Among the evidence he presents to support his claims include:

  • The fused chromosome 2 making mankind the only primate with 46 chromosomes rather than 48 which all others have (apes and monkeys). He states that it is not possible for chromosome 2 to have fused naturally.
  • Over 4000 genetic disorders.
  • Lack of body hair which he did not consider to provide any evolutionary benefit.
  • Speech capability.
  • Different and lighter bone structure including the feet which are poorly designed compared to our supposed ancestors giving an uneconomical style of walking.

Who better to explain it that the man himself:

 

 

Cheetahs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Aratron said:

Cheetahs

 

Great point. The cheetah is one example of genetic engineering as it is, according to Lloyd Pye, a blend of cat and dog, all of which are clones that are genetically the same. Shorter video this time where he also talks about evidence of genetic tinkering in plants:

 

 

Here is a link to a thread on the Stolen History forum for further reading:

https://www.stolenhistory.org/threads/are-cheetahs-the-result-of-ancient-genetic-engineering.74/

 

If certain plants and animals have been genetically engineered, this supports the case that humans may have been too and that there is more to our past than we are being told.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

Great point. The cheetah is one example of genetic engineering as it is, according to Lloyd Pye, a blend of cat and dog, all of which are clones that are genetically the same. Shorter video this time where he also talks about evidence of genetic tinkering in plants:

 

 

Here is a link to a thread on the Stolen History forum for further reading:

https://www.stolenhistory.org/threads/are-cheetahs-the-result-of-ancient-genetic-engineering.74/

 

If certain plants and animals have been genetically engineered, this supports the case that humans may have been too and that there is more to our past than we are being told.

Mix between a cat and a greyhound 

Very tame around humans for a wild animal 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×