Jump to content
DannyUK

EXPLOITING PEOPLE IN THE PUBLIC EYE - CAROLINES LAW

Recommended Posts

This is the last that I have to say on the matter for now. I don't want things to go round and round in circles but I feel that these are important points to make.

 

21 hours ago, muir said:

once again that is a survey of people who have presented to officialdom with problems

 

My previous post also linked to two other journal articles which weren't based on the Crime Survey for England and Wales. And those were just a few - there are plenty more out there.

 

21 hours ago, muir said:

it doesn't necessarily mean women suffer more abuse. It just means that women will present to officialdom with their problems more than men will

 

You seem to be assuming that it is always the female victims themselves reporting to police. Many reports come from other sources including neighbours, friends, family and bystanders.

 

21 hours ago, muir said:

men do not trust the system to listen to them or to give them fair representation.

 

I agree that there are barriers for men reporting abuse but so too are there for women.

 

Many female victims also feel that they won't be believed, particularly when the abuse they experience is minimised and denied and where gaslighting is involved - made worse if the victim has mental health issues and can easily be dismissed as unstable. They can also equally distrust authorities and/or may have had a poor response in the past. Women can also feel shame, guilt and pride that they are being hurt. They may be socially isolated meaning that they have no-one to express concerns to and to gain some important validation. Practical issues can form a barrier too such as children, schooling or financial dependency (women with children, more often than not, are the partner to sacrifice a career) - they may fear being seen as an unfit parent and may not be aware of support that is available. They may have a physical disability and be dependent on their partner for care. There is also a significant BAME population in the UK which can bring with it cultural issues and a sense of loyalty to the community, faith, family and "honour" - a language barrier may also be an issue along with an insecure immigration status and fear of deportation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

Many female victims also feel that they won't be believed, particularly when the abuse they experience is minimised and denied and where gaslighting is involved - made worse if the victim has mental health issues and can easily be dismissed as unstable. They can also equally distrust authorities and/or may have had a poor response in the past. Women can also feel shame, guilt and pride that they are being hurt. They may be socially isolated meaning that they have no-one to express concerns to and to gain some important validation. Practical issues can form a barrier too such as children, schooling or financial dependency (women with children, more often than not, are the partner to sacrifice a career) - they may fear being seen as an unfit parent and may not be aware of support that is available. They may have a physical disability and be dependent on their partner for care. There is also a significant BAME population in the UK which can bring with it cultural issues and a sense of loyalty to the community, faith, family and "honour" - a language barrier may also be an issue along with an insecure immigration status and fear of deportation.

 

i'm not saying that women don't suffer

 

I'm saying that by and large male suffering is not acknowledged. This is why there is more male suicide: because men do suffer

 

But there is not the same support for men because i would suggest there is a cultural war going on which seeks to split couples apart and it is achieved by a number of means one of which is the creation of the idea of automatic female victimhood which can incentivise women to break up marriages for example with the knowledge the courts will give them favourable settlement and which can encourage women to accept a more militant mindset towards their relations with men

 

This process has been named 'the battle of the sexes' but male and female relations should never be framed in such a light. It is framed that way by people who WANT to stoke conflict between men and women and this is done by breeding resentment and discontent

 

These are subtle processes and not easy to define and yet they exist

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/18/2020 at 8:09 PM, muir said:

Some of the points raised though relating to the OP are that there has been a huge amount of media hype over flacks death when there have been a number of men who have committed suicide when faced with similar public shaming that have not received the same attention

 

Heavy weather is being made of this and as the Op suggests it would seem that some people are seeking to make political capital out of this tragedy by using it as an excuse to shut down public questioning of the behaviour of people in the public eye

 

This might mean less paparazzi stalking of celebs but it might also mean that real crimes such as elite pedophilia won't receive the same kind of attention under the spotlight as they should

 

I have added a further point to the discussion that i believe that modern social engineering is leading to increased depression in women in middle age and that there is something toxic about this new social media age and about the discarding of traditional values which can then leave a person feeling bereft of meaning and purpose

 

My concern with Flack (Law) is that it has been cunningly prepared and pounced upon by political hyenas following her suicide and it's been accomplished fast and swiftly showing in my mind a level of preparation awaiting the perfect opportunity to launch a campaign of exploitation and appeasement of the masses to justify that campaign.

Engineering of Consent - So a preconceived solution is justified within the minds eye of the majority of the masses by the gangland Unification of the media, and other public figures and their reactions...

 

This whirlwind has already been sought after by the Royals and their proposed pressures by the media...

https___cdn_cnn.com_cnnnext_dam_assets_200109075946-mexit-newspapers.jpg.eec3bc05191debfc39c9512aaf9631d7.jpg

 

That would have been a lot harder you appease a majority whom didn't see or cry cover up and censorship by the establishment on down.

It would have been more obvious and harder to pull off by a would be Socialist movement towards a collective pressure, revolution or seeking justice...

For obvious reasons I would of thought...

From 

BP-13.jpg.8303a21b34f3841b4271f20c484a6671.jpg

To

Princess-Diana-death-2.jpg.05b2eda5986cb4245718889eeaa4b89f.jpg

Plenty more but from Jack the Ripper to Jimmy Savile but I chose the above "raid" on Buckingham Palace by the "Nazis" to appease a public whom felt pontificated to by a people out of touch with the rest of society until a stray "lone gun man" decided to attack Buckingham Palace undoubtedly a place which needed a refurb containing the likes of 9/11 evidence of where $2.1 trillion may have ended up which we will unfortunately now never know about now...

You get the idea, to Princess Diana.

No more needs to be said...

 

What this is really about and used the exploitation of a celebrity and their death to achieve this, while gaining other celebrity supporters not because of the case of Flacks death, but because they also want this state of censorship to have the good without the bad press of their own little bubble world and so seek to take advantage of this situation likewise. Maybe a cynical view and gross generalisation but unfortunately for the majority I suspect the case and others really are Mkultra Drones...

 

This isn't the separate argument of domestic abuse which in and of itself is a debate worth having, but my assessment is that domestic abuse is being exploited to justify mass censorship of this level, so this becomes somewhat a mute point or means of distraction from the most pressing issue here actually is and political vampirism can take place from them while making the issue appear to be genuinely about Flacks circumstances and not the preconceived exploitation which it is...

 

It would be like me stating that during war time the establishment needs to censor the media for purposes of morale - in itself and exploitation of the word moral as it's what war is lacking in spades - and a state of propaganda is justified.

 

We then have an argument over morality of war or propaganda while evading the clear issue of justified censorship to cover up actuality which a certain crowd can do with out that actuality being witnessed, so their state of war can continue by way of justification and blatant propaganda.

This is an information war we are within right now...

 

Again, domestic abuse and situations limited to Flacks situation is being exploited to justify this censorship, regardless of if or not any domestic abuse has taken place, or if or not women or men are more responsible than one another in the UK or across the globe.

 

The idea of a previous post with an image of Flack, could just be taken to mean literally woman are also guilty of domestic abuse not just victims as maybe imagined due to the lack of men whom report such circumstances, to say let's not kid ourselves in a type of advertisement.

Not that Flack herself or on a personal level targeting her within her personal relationships.

It has the potential to do both and has been setup to achieve both in my mind as this political bandwagon is pushed to justify censorship.

 

This incident is clear and if the media reported false information without evidence, we don't need censorship, if it bothers people they challenge the media with libel action.

Or you can simply make a public statement using the media, social media dismissing what is being said and in today's age that information, being a public figure it will be received and spread by many, just like this petition will spread like wildfire at the obvious "blasphemy" of the press and no censorship would be necessary.

But that's the point.

Censorship, is necessary.

 

Like 9/11 and laws quite obviously drafted and prepared before the event happened they apparently didn't know about and the situation exploited and pounced upon - their pearl harbour which they were waiting for the perfect opportunity to exploit - in an a likewise manner.

I suggest this due to the amount of traction this has gained and how it was handled and exploited in a streamlined manner throughout all the media whom have hung, drawn and quartered the media as though they know full well the media is responsible for Flacks death, anymore than Flack is apparently guilty of domestic abuse...

 

A presumption has been made in both cases hasn't it?

 

Only one is building a case which has support and momentum, while the other is being castrated as "fake news", Conspiracy or at best unfair?

It's a serious state of duality, isn't it?

That's screams of exploitation.

It stinks or predetermined events and outcome before a hearing doesn't it?

 

For all we know, Flack could have felt guilty for the crime of domestic abuse and dealing with all the pressures, simply exemplified because she is a public figure and she simply didn't want this part of her life within the public domain like most individuals wouldn't.  

Thus, she couldn't openly condemn the accusations of the press via social media or mainstream media because they were true and she felt trapped with the only option of appearing as guilty which she didn't want the public to receive nor ruin her career, ego or relationship.

 

Sounds a lot more likely to me...

 

So she committed suicide - if correct - because of this not singularly because of "unjustifed attacks or mishandling of news by the media."

 

That presumption has been made deliberately to demonise the media to justify the state of censorship which is needed by the establishment and this will be spread via social media likewise as censorship via further exploitation and the stretching of laws which exploit the suffering of Flack and undoubtedly other celebrities, possibly another Diana like incident even if synthesised.

 

The media shouldn't be allowed to present an opinion of guilt or opinion news as facts and information still yet to be determined without presenting what they say as speculation and that news being limited not repeated through all the msm which is often glanced at and not throughly read as opinion.

That would solve this issue but then censorship can't be justified can it?

Not unless its self censorship.

 

The fact an investigation agaisnt someone is occurring regardless of guilt of someone within the public eye or figure of any kind should be newsworthy but shouldn't be sensationalised or exploited and the deeper analysis of such situations should only be allowed once there is enough evidence to suggest these facts and they're dead, or a case has been heard and them found guilty.

 

Might I remind people.

Guilty people aren't allows found guilty.

Innocent people aren't always found innocent...

Yet, by these proposed changes within the media, we are being led down a path that these determined black and white circumstances are the only realities which will and can be presented within the media, otherwise they're not true and liable by the media, unless you attack someone the establishment wants to undermine and ridicule like David Icke and then that's ok go right ahead no problem to worry about. But, of course David Icke and people like him will still be attacked.

It's a Scam and will therefore be witnessed as such if that isn't what gets censored...

You count on it!

 

47qldqmzhhi31.png.6230947aca0179d22fb2c5382d53fa2c.png

 

Its about cultivating this snowflake worship of authority mentality, that they know best and those authorities should have the potential power to conceal their crimes, connections to the Jimmy Saviles and Jeffrey Epsteins of this world. 

 

Flack is an avenue to exploit this blatantly to me.

 

That, they already desired these laws to amend the use of the media in the odd time it does do its job correctly by reporting on the news of potential skullduggery with an eye of speculation and investigative journalism.

This threatens the nature of this if such laws are justified, it's a war and unfortunately this type of skullduggery is usually the first casualty of Warfare.

What are the establishment preparing for?

 

Most notably, those shenanigans of the system.

The system, often overshadow by celebrity gossip to subdue the senses of the silent majority because they're too busy consumed with BS media hype and advertising as top priority of the news delivered to them without complaint, because often they don't know about this or don't care. Either way, the establishment has been successful at carrying out their job of subduing their senses, haven't they?

 

The concerns you raise about Woman as being revolutionary to take over Men within the workplace as though this is equality until they're too late to have children does seem like a perfect mechanism of Population Control, breaking down the traditional family unit and preparing individuals for the gender less human upgrade via Transhumanism.

Currently, I'd say the majority is on Population Control and cuckolding men, like PPI whom didn't - necessarily - want need or ask for it.

Cuckold Consciousness as I've termed this in the past.

Here and somewhere on the old David Icke Forum I had a post...

 

Edited by DannyUK
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, DannyUK said:

This isn't the separate argument of domestic abuse which in and of itself is a debate worth having, but my assessment is that domestic abuse is being exploited to justify mass censorship of this level, so this becomes somewhat a mute point or means of distraction from the most pressing issue here actually is and political vampirism can take place from them while making the issue appear to be genuinely about Flacks circumstances and not the preconceived exploitation which it is...

 

I agree

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sir-cyril-smith-mp-died-9-10-taking-part-in-anti-abortion-rally-shutterstock-editorial-1947761a.jpg.58c84a46358836e81fc921d05ee692b8.jpg

In other news...

Can you imagine?

These historic allegations may never be "news worthy" and deemed of public interest if this law is used in the incorrect manner.

 

1628866-main-image.png

The incorrect manner in my opinion, is the whole reason this law is actually being created and pushed. 

Carolines Suicide as a mere catalyst to exploit and push this censorship into being by the higher echelons of the establishment, whom believe themselves to be God via their many avenues of control, which oftem means anything which doesn't have a chip within it already is to get one very soon.

The 'Mark of the Beast' is SMART 

Establishment Covering up their own Crimes - Censorship 

So incidents like this which expose the establishment and their intermingled public figures of celebrity status, don't get the public attention they otherwise deserve and therefore those whom aid and abet those criminals can get off the hook scott free and never be investigated in the first place, as those establishment figures can continue to bury the truth behind a wall of censorship, essentially protect their own arse before it becomes exposed in the first place.

That until an investigation has been taken place and they've been found guilty, it can never become public knowledge by being within the mainstream media or alternative.

Social Media is being attacked in a like minded manner, in attempts to attack individuals with laws created to gag and censor the press keeping them under the thumb of offically sanctified points of view, engaged via political correctness, another deception upon free speech.

As though they're journalist's and not people speaking about newsworthy events and simply giving their opinion...

The biggest problem being, they're not of the correct offically sanctified opinion!

 

They believe themselves to be Above the Law

Cyril Smiths crimes may never have even become public knowledge, let alone the involvement of Lord Steel or other so called "Honourable Gentlemen" within the inner sanctum of Royalty believing themselves to be too big to be touched and exposed so that they can get away with whatever they want.

 

This is the real war to reshape the face of the media, along with the so called attacks on the BBC to reshape it, so it becomes offically approved by an authority, the establishment, whom ensures it ain't "fake news" because they don't want it to be proven or exposed.

 

It's very obvious why they need to reshape the BBC ever since the exposed establishment Pedophilia cover up involving the BBC and so they've lost all public respect and credibility. They're attempting to sell this reshaping as some kind of crusade by the same establishment whom still want to go on covering up their crimes but appear credible as they do it?

 

They want to control public opinion, perspective and put a lid on their own activities but still be able to get away with their crimes and not have to synthesis fake investigations which are designed to go nowhere so the public are left wanting and asking obvious questions about where is the justice?

Along with equally synthetic attacks on people whom may very well be innocent to justify protecting those whom are most definitely guilty when those allegations have been found lacking of evidence at a later date, which is why they where synthesised in the first place...

 

The overwhelming desire and need for Adrenochrome being only one big reason these practices of establishment Pedophilia must continue.

 

Lord Steel quits after report finds authorities 'turned a blind eye' to Westminster child abuse claims
25179742-0-image-a-66_1582646823831.jpg.70e4806b90f5ce5e810bf71b2b49576b.jpg
Liberal Democrats peer Lord Steel has quit today, after an inquiry criticised him for failing to report child sex abuse claims against the late MP Cyril Smith.

The former Liberal party leader said he would retire from the Lords “as soon as possible”, after the report accused Steel of an “abdication of responsibility” for failing to act on historic allegations.

The Indepdent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse claimed there was widespread evidence that politicians and police “turned a blind eye” to claims of child sexual abuse and were involved in “actively shielding and protecting” abusers.

Smith and Conservative MP Sir Peter Morrison were “known to be active in their sexual interest in children, but were protected from prosecution” throughout the 1980s by their respective parties.

“Given what Lord Steel knew, it was inappropriate that he saw fit to nominate Smith for a knighthood,” the report said. “In our view, rather than give primacy to the protection of children he yielded to considerations of political expediency and failed to launch a formal internal inquiry into Smith’s alleged activities.”

Today Lord Steel said: “Knowing all I know now, I condemn Cyril Smith’s actions towards children.

“Not having secured a parliamentary scalp, I fear that I have been made a proxy for Cyril Smith.”

Smith, who Steel recommended for a knighthood, died in 2010.

But the report did not stop at blaming these few individuals.

Although the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse said there was no evidence of an organised “Westminster paedophile network” in which children were passed between “persons of prominence”, the report published today found political parties, police and prosecutors ignored victims and showed excessive “deference” to MPs and ministers.

It said there had been “significant failures by Westminster institutions in their responses to allegations of child sexual abuse”.

“This included failure to recognise it, turning a blind eye to it, actively shielding and protecting child sexual abusers and covering up allegations,” the report said.

“At that time, nobody seemed to care about the fate of the children involved, with status and political concerns overriding all else,” the report said.

It added: “Even though we did not find evidence of a Westminster network, the lasting effect on those who suffered as children from being sexually abused by individuals linked to Westminster has been just as profound. It has been compounded by institutional complacency and indifference to the plight of child victims.”

There was “no evidence that party whips deliberately suppressed any specific information about child sexual abuse”, the report concluded. “However, we also gained the distinct impression that the whips’ offices were concerned above all to protect the image of their party. There was a consistent culture for years of playing down rumours and protecting politicians from gossip or scandal at all costs.”

Publishing the findings, the inquiry team said “institutions must learn from past mistakes in order to better protect children in future”. Specifically, they called on the government, political parties and other Westminster institutions to introduce whistleblowing procedures to cover abuse and exploitation, as well as a review of safeguarding policies.

It has also recommended that the Cabinet Office reconsider its position on posthumous forfeiture of honours, “in order to consider the perspectives of victims and survivors of child sexual abuse”.

Publishing the findings, the inquiry team said “institutions must learn from past mistakes in order to better protect children in future”. Specifically, they called on the government, political parties and other Westminster institutions to introduce whistleblowing procedures to cover abuse and exploitation, as well as a review of safeguarding policies.

It has also recommended that the Cabinet Office reconsider its position on posthumous forfeiture of honours, “in order to consider the perspectives of victims and survivors of child sexual abuse”.

Publishing the findings, the inquiry team said “institutions must learn from past mistakes in order to better protect children in future”. Specifically, they called on the government, political parties and other Westminster institutions to introduce whistleblowing procedures to cover abuse and exploitation, as well as a review of safeguarding policies.

It has also recommended that the Cabinet Office reconsider its position on posthumous forfeiture of honours, “in order to consider the perspectives of victims and survivors of child sexual abuse”.


https://f7td5.app.goo.gl/sSDNYH

 

 

Edited by DannyUK
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

British politicians 'covered up child sex abuse for decades'

b79637679b59483e988d3ccbf6db895f_18.jpg.822e6f4d799cfc449c07edac56822539.jpg

The clear inversion and deception of these people would be enough for many to not accept what is common knowledge nowadays.

Just like many so called "Conspiracy Theories" the truth is so bizarre and inverted that it is hard to believe or accept. That's how they continue to get away with their rule via deception, evil that is presented as an untouchable, unquestionable actions,  committed by "Phantom" Projections of Honourable personas, caught up within "Charity" work feeding a smokescreen of credible they're otherwise don't deserve and are lacking in spades and then couldn't as easily get away with their corruption and perversions.

 

This hasn't gone away, we just know about this within a historic basis now and so censorship is being rolled out now to ensure these kind of exposures are minimised within future, so hopefully they don't happen again - the exposure becoming the crime not the actions of the corrupt criminal and most notably Pedophilia...

 

This is what many Unbeknownst unwilling participants are signing up for when they demand this type of censorship to protect celebrities from themselves or the media whom are already breaking laws when they set out to slander and defame someone's image, those people whom obviously are not within these rings of people whom continue to get away with their crimes while alive, misrepresentating themselves so they can get away with their crimes that will remain uninvestigated from behind their phoney accumulation of credibility. Credibility for them is like a credit score for how much corruption they're entitled to get away with due to previous services rendered to the machine, the system.

A sort of sick sense of Karma, their projection of their good works justifying their intentions, their desire to do evil.

 

From the 1960s to the '90s, senior UK politicians protected child sexual abusers, an inquiry has found.

 

British politicians turned a blind eye to the sexual abuse of children and actively covered up allegations over decades, an independent inquiry into historical sex offences in Westminster has found.

The inquiry did not find evidence of an organised paedophile network in its examination of the period, covering the 1960s through until the '90s.

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/02/british-politicians-covered-child-sex-abuse-decades-200226095332809.html

 

Clearly, we couldn't possibly be witnessing another cover up, lies and deception?

These elite Pedophile Rings do not exist, that's why they exist across the globe where people of public influence are to be hijacked by this Globalist network.

 

They've investigated themselves, they've thrown a few expendable people under the bus, told us what they could by minimising risk and get away with.

We accept this...?

 

Edited by DannyUK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Di6jzdBU8AAv_UG.jpg.2358f3d4b7ccd729d03960e5acc70901.jpg

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1021527582112718849.html?refreshed=1533770902

 

Below Video...

 

Talking about institutional pedophilia, cover up, the links between the activities of Jimmy Savile, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew well before the recent acknowledgements, of what is clear signs of an all too common international institution pedophilia networks, repeating patterns of activities Globally, in whatever nation they find themselves.


Yet, no politicians would bring up the subject while some of them stating it would obviously be fobbed off in response...

 

y44wv4mw-1393435068.jpg.6efe160e8d2db89e45c7df7453b68b9a.jpg

Liberty my arse!

 

Someone whom tried to get sexual photos of children to take, share and download as legal and "not necessarily abuse" in and off itself!
That should tell you all you need to know about the mental of these people, what they're trying to justify and aid in abet within covering up so the activities become normalised on the front, while even deeper perverse evil takes place behind even what they attempt to justify it behind within the shadows of what becomes normalised, so their crimes can be brushed off!

 

Then these people go to the police for them being harassed?
Talk about 1984 Orwellian Inversion!

Not wanting to be harassed about it?

 

Until it's handled any politician deserves harassment about this instead of accepting their script to get ahead which they obviously desire as only one way communication which we should accept as offically sanctified, so therefore, "correct".

Then people will see that politics isn't what people believe it to be.


This would have been condemned as "Fake News" or "Conspiracy Theory". People ought to think about this as undoubtedly since people like this tried to expose what was going on it has come to a time and place where it is unable to keep disclosed although, they will try to keep a lid on it, cover up and throw a few people under the bus to protect the rest of them as though "something is being done."

While the reality is, they just aren't doing anything beyond maintaining everything to stay the same...

 

These people are quite clearly self motivated career minded politicians whom are out for their own interests, not wanting to rock the boat but feed that system and protect it so things will be just fine for them. At best...

 

 

hewitt-and-harmans-pie.jpg.8da284a7e8d4daa9724911981578da3e.jpg

Paedo letter links Hewitt and Harman

https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/politics/653796/paedo-letter-links-hewitt-and-harman-2/

 

While also, make no mistake about it...

The system protects those genuine predator criminals, pedophiles, so long as they can get away with doing so.

While those they want to destroy, they associate themselves with crimes of which they're guilty.

Targeting people whom most odten, likely aren't guilty to destroy them and their reputation, so know one will believe what they've got to say before even opening their mouth.

Due to fears of them exposing something...

 

That's why they do it.

That's another form of inversion and practice used to censor and stop many truths of Conspiracy to Cover ups from getting out and becoming common knowledge.

Until then, they're "Fake News" and "Conspiracy Theory" hidden among another mass form of censorship by obscurity within actual fake news and conspiracy so people won't know the difference and so be cultivated to distance themselves from them altogether.

In reality, the majority of those genuine fake news and conspiracy theories are actually pushed out by the intelligence apparatus so know one knows what to believe.

JFK is a classic example where everyone has been accused of some level of guilt to obscure the genuine cover up, so the majority simply don't know what to believe, even if undoubtedly so many know full well some form of skullduggery happened, they maintain themselves behind obscuring the truth. Jack the Ripper, another classic example...

 

Instead, they will have to accept the credibility of what the establishment sanction as genuine or fake by placing and all aware, all knowing, all seeing eye upon the world, war via technological surveillance and censorship.

Even if, that all seeing eye is guilty and protecting their own lies, cover up and conspiracy.

 

_98761259_online_portrait_logo_976x549-2.jpg.69bf99db4b71d3858f704840c51f249a.jpg

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-41928747

 

How anyone can still have any doubts and give the BBC any form of credibility is beyond me.

How anyone can believe that the establishment is trying to "bring down the BBC" by the hand of Boris is equally beyond me. It's about revitalising the BBC and making a new package for the same agenda to continue behind, a new front because the old one has become damaged and tarnished.

Its equivocal to the new monarchy.

The same as the old old monarchy...

The irony is, those establishment types behind BBC are the ones whom need a reality check, instead of pointificating to the world how things should be accepted so we will become passive to their crimes and accepting of their wars which become justified and a credible reality.

Edited by DannyUK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/28/2020 at 9:41 PM, hayed joe said:

Jeremy Kyle was mentioned in this thread, and I wasn't sure to post in the Caroline Flack thread.

But the Producer of Jeremy Kyle Show found dead nine months after the show was axed. https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/breaking-jeremy-kyle-show-producer-21600181.amp

Dead people are easier to pin stuff on than living to raise objections? 

 

 

I remember seeing something to do with this in newspapers in passing and didn't pay it much attention thinking if I found myself on Jeremy Kyle I'd probably kill myself also...

 

I see anything to do with JK and my mind either turns off, or if someone has it on in the background I get annoyed with myself for becoming involved when really I couldn't give a shit but it does show how our emotions can be exploited likewise, drawn in, engaged and then usually the system propaganda of things commences as we have it justified in our minds eye, as that's the right way, that's the correction or we are guilt tripped by bullying and condemnation better than any religious ceremony to guilt trip people into accepting their beliefs as being a righteous path towards our only salvation.

Often, this is simply their path, a program.

Not always but this is how this has been exploited for the systematised attention of peoples minds and turning Spirituality into Religion, where the systematisation has lost the basic ground of spirituality by it becoming systematised...

 

It's philosophy, art meaning their is no correct path. Those whom present this "correct path", present a condensed systematisation of things in accordance to their liking while engaging you within their idea that anything other than this is wrong. Group think ensuring maintenance of these ideals no matter how wrong they maybe.

 

This to my mind is ok when an individual chooses it themselves, not when it is brow beat into them via the force of law, legislation by people whom don't live a life anything like of the majority of people whom they impose such laws upon.

War being a perfect example.

How many people whom start and justify the Wars actually fight them?

 

How many people are conned into accepting and carrying out acts of War and are brought  into justifying a way of thinking so they will support that war and condemn anyone else whom doesn't support it likewise to those whom have been conned into doing so?

 

How many people can be convinced they're being invaded by an army or are on the brink of such an impending threat of such happening and having their way of life changed and under attack and so the solution is being the forceful invader of another country - becoming what they see as the enemy - far beyond the propaganda that has been told and sold you to justify these people committing actions far worse than their enemies, which justified them being their in the first instance?

 

Only the problem exists when we don't see the enemy within ourselves...

Or impose prohibition while ourselves binge drinking for example.

cebdd55de3a5158b2bbe5f6c0d3ba1d2.jpg.ba8df5ba6dfef67b698b532c5465da38.jpg

Yes it appears that way.

Public figures especially, they die and have politically spun ideas prepared to use and just need the correct opportunity to inact those political ideals. So, this mentality is simply how the PTB use any opportunity to exploit to get their own way, nothing is out of bounds as everything is turned into politics simply for politically motivated goals.

Not actually to help or deliver the solution but their preplanned agenda.

calvin.jpg.54e4cbf493d5ce1726fe48ded78783e1.jpg

It's more common with False Flags but this is definitely being obscured between the lines of celebrity status, public figures, most notably politicans and Royals, thanks to Edward Bernays with Calvin Coolidge you may trace back this thread of "modern" celebrity, icon status where the Iconoclasm of such will be them mutually destroying themselves when their illusions are shattered...

They have been misused to perverse peoples minds, leeched upon by political hyenas, behind a sensationalised Fantasia, distraction of attention into so called celebrities, whom can be used to inact those political ideals.

1841277955_images(20).jpeg.1c595dad644af786a04c506fd6a32a91.jpeg

Why?

 

Speaking of which...

Calvin Coolidge took over a crooked political office where to justify anything extreme could have launched a public backlash so they needed to keep them sweet and "cool".

On the back of 

 

The Teapot Dome scandal was a bribery scandal involving the administration of United States President Warren G. Harding from 1921 to 1923.

 

And Affairs, he also suddenly died so the scandal could disappear and the show go on.

2 August 1923

 

No matter what, it was a matter of political convenience for him to disappear.

 

Scandals

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Warren-G-Harding/Scandals

 

Does anyone remember Eamonn Holmes interviewing David Icke?

20200301-183939.jpg

Eamonn Holmes faces a £250k bill after losing his tax case and accuses HMRC of 'reinventing the rules' to snare him 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8039551/Eamonn-Holmes-faces-250k-bill-losing-tax-case.html

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×