Jump to content

The health timebomb

Recommended Posts

Its my belief that the cabal who control the worlds mega-corporations are conspiring with complicit governments to put out products that contain substances toxic to life in order to cull the human herd and to lessen their vitality and intelligence so that they may be more easily controlled and corralled into their long planned for world government.


This thread will be an exploration of ways in which this agenda is being carried out. I believe that the cabal is concealing the extent of the damage which they are causing society through their ownership of the corporate media and their influence over government for example through the pressure exerted by the pharmaceutical lobby which is the biggest lobby in the US.


I also believe however that as this healthtime bomb they are creating begins to detonate that it will become harder and harder for them to argue that environmental factors are not impacting peoples health and that the higher stats are just caused by 'better diagnosis'


The sooner the majority of people wake upto this agenda the sooner steps to mitigate the damage can be taken by society and some degree of health restored to the general population. I believe that the deliberate sabotage of health is war by other means and needs to be exposed for the public good

  • Like 3

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Caused by environmental factors such as aluminium (eg in vaccines or geoengineering) or through the drastic increase in electromagnetic fields in recent years?


Alzheimer’s disease may affect twice as many people as estimates suggest

BySarah Knapton, Science Editor , at The Mayo Clinic, Minnesota

3 April 2019 • 8:00pm

Alzheimer’s disease probably affects twice as many people as current estimates suggest but sufferers are yet to show symptoms, experts believe.

Scientists at The Mayo Clinic in Minnesota have been reevaluating the prevalence of the disease using brain imaging to give a definitive answer as to how many people are actually affected.

In Britain it is thought around 850,000 people have the disease, but most are diagnosed through clinical assessments when they are already showing symptoms.


  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Number of toxic chemicals applied to vegetables has risen 17 fold since the 1960s

By Katie Morley, Consumer Affairs Editor

27 November 2017 • 2:25pm
The number of chemicals applied to supermarket vegetable crops has increased by up to 17 fold in 40 years, data shows, as the organic food industry and scientists have warned that consumers are exposed to a “toxic cocktail” of pesticides.

Figures released for the first time by the Soil Association, which certifies organic food, show the number of toxic chemicals applied to onions, leeks, wheat and potatoes has been steadily increasing since the 1960s. 

This is despite industry data showing that the weight of pesticides applied in the UK has halved since the 1990s. 

Speaking at a Royal Society of Medicine conference on pesticides yesterday, where the figures were unveiled, scientists warned that consuming tiny amounts of many different chemicals on a regular basis could be harmful to human health. 

Consumption of "toxic cocktails" of low levels of pesticide cocktails are thought to be linked with degenerative diseases like strokes, heart attacks and cancers. 


  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Iowa Town Bans Fluoride And Ends Program As Chemical’s Danger Becomes Apparent

March 25, 2019

A small town in northwestern Iowa called Ida Grove has voted to end treating its city’s drinking water with fluoride.

The Ida Grove City Council voted to halt fluoride treatment in the city’s water supply, the Sioux City Journal reported. The move comes after city leaders and residents challenged whether the fluoride was effective at preventing tooth decay or presented health risks.

A recent survey distributed through utility bills found that most citizens of the 2,000 population city didn’t support fluoridation, according to the clerk’s office.

Fluoridating water has long been debated across the country, and some opponents have argued that its health effects aren’t completely understood.


There are three types of fluoride used to “fluoridate” water supplies: Fluorosilicic acid, sodium fluorosilicate, and sodium fluoride.

Fluorosilicic acid is the type most often used for cost reasons, and it is derived from phosphate fertilizers according to the CDC’s website.

The other two are created by adding either table salt or caustic soda to the mix.

Although if you bring up the topic of fluoride you are heavily ridiculed, the cited scientific research in this article will make you think twice. That maybe, just maybe a chemical does cause damage to the human body in numerous ways and is linked to several disorders affecting teeth, bones, the brain, and the thyroid gland, as well as lowering IQ.

To this writer’s knowledge, everything started in 1995 when Dr. Phyllis Mullenix Ph.D., a highly respected pharmacologist and toxicologist, found that rats who had fluoride added to their diet exhibited abnormal behavioral traits in a published study.

In 2005, a study conducted at the Harvard School of Dental Health found that fluoride in tap water directly contributed to causing bone cancer in young boys.

“New American research suggests that boys exposed to fluoride between the ages of five and 10 will suffer an increased rate of osteosarcoma – bone cancer – between the ages of 10 and 19,” according to a London Observer article about the study.

Based on the findings of the study, the respected Environmental Working Group — a non-profit research organization environmental watchdog — lobbied to have fluoride in tap water be added to the U.S. government’s classified list of substances known or anticipated to cause cancer.

After reviewing fluoride toxicological data, the NRC reported in 2006, “It’s apparent that fluorides have the ability to interfere with the functions of the brain.”

In another article by Scientific American, a study “Concluded that fluoride can subtly alter endocrine function, especially in the thyroid — the gland that produces hormones regulating growth and metabolism.”

The report also notes that “a series of epidemiological studies in China have associated high fluoride exposures with lower IQ.”

“Epidemiological studies and tests on lab animals suggest that high fluoride exposure increases the risk of bone fracture, especially in vulnerable populations such as the elderly and diabetics,” writes Dan Fagin.

Fagin interviewed Steven Levy, director of the Iowa Fluoride Study which tracked about 700 Iowa children for sixteen years. Nine-year-old “Iowa children who lived in communities where the water was fluoridated were 50 percent more likely to have mild fluorosis… than [nine-year-old] children living in nonfluoridated areas of the state,” writes Fagin.

In 2012, years later, a Reuters headline read: “Harvard Study Finds Fluoride Lowers IQ – Published in Federal Gov’t Journal.”

Then the U.S. government finally admitted in 2015 that they’ve overdosed Americans on fluoride and, for the first time since 1962, lowered its recommended level of fluoride in drinking water, Mercola reported.

Even the Chinese have found that fluoride in drinking water causes damage to children’s livers and kidneys, according to an August 2006 Chinese study.

So is the anti-fluoride conspiracy global?  Or maybe there is really something there to suggest that chemical waste is dangerous … go figure.


Interestingly enough, when digging I found a case in town where they found out the hard way that fluoride added to their water supply began corroding pipes and even damaging city vehicles.

In 2014, a report from the world’s oldest and most prestigious medical journal, The Lancet, officially classified fluoride as a neurotoxin — in the same category as arsenic, lead, and mercury.

Further, the EPA published a now-deleted document stating that fluoride is a chemical “with substantial evidence of developmental neurotoxicity.”

A study, published in the journal Environmental Health in 2015, found that states with a higher portion of artificially fluoridated water had a higher prevalence of ADHD. This relationship held up across six different years examined. The authors, psychologists Christine Till and Ashley Malin at Toronto’s York University, looked at the prevalence of fluoridation by state in 1992 and rates of ADHD diagnoses in subsequent years.

“States in which a greater proportion of people received artificially-fluoridated water in 1992 tended to have a greater proportion of children and adolescents who received ADHD diagnoses [in later years], after controlling for socioeconomic status,” Malin says. Wealth is important to take into account because the poor are more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD, she says. After income was adjusted for, though, the link held up.”

Another study in 2015 from the University of Kent suggests that fluoride in drinking water may trigger depression and weight gain by causing thyroid problems, Telegraph.co.uk reported.

Fluoride isn’t the only chemical to worry about in our water; in 2017, the  Environmental Working Group, released a searchable database that shows almost 50,000 public water systems in the U.S. that are contaminated with dozens of harmful chemicals.

Some of the chemicals found in your drinking water include – arsenic, hexavalent chromium, radiation, chloroform, perfluorooctanoic acid, Bromodichloromethane, Dichloroacetic acid, Barium, and Uranium; and that’s just scratching the surface of the 250-plus contaminants the group discovered.


In 2016, the EWG found that two-thirds of Americans’ water is contaminated with the carcinogen that Erin Brockovich exposed – chemical chromium 6 or hexavalent chromium – affecting the tap water of more than 218 million Americans.

2008 study by the National Toxicology Program found that chromium-6 in drinking water caused cancer in rats and mice that were exposed to the chemical.

read on here https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/iowa-town-bans-fluoride-and-ends-program-as-chemicals-danger-becomes-apparent.html


  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Big pharma and their complicit stooges in the government are so desperate to get their toxic products into people that they even coerce health staff. A simple examination of the ingredients in vaccines shows the toxic substances that are put into these products for example whilst mercury derivative thimerosol has been withdrawn from many vaccines it is still used in flu vaccines but mercury is a known neuro-toxin


Vaccines are known by the industry to cause 'non specific effects' but these have not been properly studied as studies tend to revolve around the efficacy of the individual vaccines at preventing the ailement they are designed to prevent. But if they prevent one problem only to cause multiple other problems then those other problems need to be identified and assessed in order to make a proper risk to benefit ration assessment. As things currently stand we are not sufficiently equipped with the full data required to assess the full range of impacts caused by vaccines. Further to this not all adverse reactions to vaccines are reported by parents to doctors and not all reports are then passed on by doctors so even the official stats on adverse reactions will not provide the full story.


Many adverse effects take time to manifest for example because the toxins in the vaccines are accumulative and also can combine with other environmental factors such as glyphosate and therefore many ailments caused by vaccines will not be recognised by the victim as being related to the vaccine(s) they received.


Individual health staff are not able to make a stand against these things because they simply lose their jobs and are replaced by others who will take the money and keep their mouths shut. It really needs a collective stand from large numbers of health staff for example through organised Unions.


NHS staff who refuse flu vaccine may be banned from treating patients

By Henry Bodkin

7 September 2018 • 7:28pm
Doctors and nurses who refuse to have a flu jab this winter could be banned from working with patients, the NHS regulator has warned.

Health chiefs announced on Friday that frontline staff who fail to get the vaccine will be forced to explain themselves and may be “redeployed” away from wards.

The significant hardening of policy follows the crisis in NHS hospitals last winter, principally in A&E, driven by the worst outbreak of influenza in seven years.

Despite the threat posed by the condition, nearly one third of frontline health care workers had not been vaccinated.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Cell phone tower shut down at elementary school after eight kids are diagnosed with cancer in 'mysterious' cluster

  • The affected students at Weston Elementary School in Ripon are all under the age of 10
  • They each have different types of cancer: brain, kidney, liver and lymphoma 
  • There is scant evidence that cell phone towers pose a real risk to humans
  • But even skeptics say the number of cases in this cluster is unusual
  • Sprint, which owns the tower, has shut it down despite insisting the radio frequency levels are 100 times below the federal limit
  • A private investigator for the patients' moms found the levels were higher than reported 

By Mia De Graaf Health Editor For Dailymail.com

Published: 17:53, 4 April 2019 | Updated: 19:44, 4 April 2019

Eight children have been diagnosed with cancer at the same elementary school - prompting parents' fears that a cell phone tower could be to blame.

The affected students at Weston Elementary School in Ripon are all under the age of 10, each with different types of cancer: brain, kidney, liver and lymphoma.

There is scant evidence that cell phone towers pose a real risk to humans, but even skeptics say the number of cases affecting children in such a small city is unusual.

Sprint, which owns the tower, has shut it down despite insisting the radio frequency levels are 100 times below the federal limit.

But the kids' mothers say their own private investigator found much higher levels, though still below the limit.



Edited by muir

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The true goal of immunization

By Jon Rappaport

In the recent propaganda campaign, designed to use a measles outbreak as an example of what happens when parents don’t vaccinate their children, commentators have stated that, prior to the “epidemic,” measles cases in the area had shrunk to zero—as if eliminating the disease were a proper goal of vaccination.

This is bluster and nonsense. At one time, before the obsession to give shots took hold, parents would take their children to the home of a child who had come down with measles, so these kids could catch the illness and be done with it.


Zero reported measles cases is no sign that all is well. Vaccines can and do cause other very serious disease problems, and because the symptoms don’t resemble measles, other names are given to these conditions, and no connection is made to the effects of vaccines.

The true goal of immunization has nothing to do with vaccination. It has to do with strengthening a child’s immune system so he/she can stage an acute and full inflammatory response when illness occurs, after which the child gains lifelong immunity from measles, mumps, chickenpox, and the like.

A child with a weak immune system will become ill from a number of causes, regardless of vaccinations. One of these major causes is poor nutrition. No vaccine can cure that. Good clean food can.

But these simple facts are ignored as “conspiracy theory” by doctors. If a mainstream doctor gives any credence to the idea of making the immune system stronger, he’ll deny this reduces or eliminates the need for vaccination.

Of course, the medical attacks leveled at “anti-vaxxers” are, at the highest level, nothing more than an insistence that chemical drugs and vaccines must continue to sell. These power players are quite aware that a sensible and natural approach to healthcare does, as a matter of course, vastly reduce the interest in their products.

When it comes to fundamental politics, the medical cartel has, for a hundred years—backed by government and huge media operations—been engaged in the process of holding the planet hostage to chemical treatments. This is an example of why the Founders never permitted government to engage in commercial operations.

The result would be enforced monopoly.

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vaccines for profit and destruction

By Jon Rappaport


“Whatever else modern medicine has wrought—and it has given birth to some impressive technical fixes and pinpoint trauma care—it has produced an unprecedented transformation of society into a universal hospital. Medicine, Rockefeller motivated, makes disease, and then treats what it has made. There is no other commercial operation on the planet that exceeds its reach or profit. Create an endless problem, and then pretend to solve it: that is the secret mission. Make the solution a new problem begging for more answers: that is the strategy. Reduce vitality and life-force: that is the objective. Control of the disabled is far easier than control of the robustly healthy.” (Notes on Vaccines, Jon Rappoport)

I point your attention to a recent riveting article, “Vaccines: Gateway Drugs by Design,” at Robert Kennedy, Jr.’s World Mercury Project. The author of the article is Kristina Kristen.

Kristen lays out a case for drug companies as creators of disease, via their childhood vaccines—which diseases they then treat with their own hugely profitable drugs. A closed circle.

Key quotes from the article:

“The main vaccine producing companies, the ‘BIG 4’, Merck, GSK, Pfizer, Sanofi, who make all our children’s vaccines, list the very illnesses now seen in epidemic numbers in our children, in their own vaccine inserts, as potential adverse effects.”

“The drug ‘treatment’ side of the equation, which is substantially more lucrative than the ‘gateway’ vaccine side the BIG 4 already monopolized, now also increased substantially. The vaccine manufacturers began to capitalize on the known adverse effects of their vaccines, and have since created drugs for the ‘treatment’ side of the equation as well. The lack of incentive to make safe products, which created the bloated vaccine schedule, became the gateway to the lucrative drug treatment side for these companies. Today, the BIG 4 monopolize vaccines as well as the drug ‘treatments’ for chronic illnesses known to be induced by vaccines. First, vaccines push kids off the cliff, and then vaccine makers profit from ‘rescuing’ those they don’t kill.”

“It is NOT A COINCIDENCE that the same BIG 4 companies, GSK, Merck, Sanofi and Pfizer, the largest manufacturers of vaccines in the U.S., happen to also produce the top grossing drugs that treat the most common side effects from their own vaccines: Autoimmunity, asthma, anaphylaxis, allergies, ADHD, rheumatoid arthritis, epilepsy, etc.”

“Vaccines, in fact, make up the foundation of the BIG 4 trillion-dollar drug skyscrapers [companies] built on treating the chronic illnesses they KNOWINGLY create with their vaccines (again, the adverse effects are written in their vaccine inserts).”

One example among many: Advair, a drug for asthma, manufactured by vaccine giant GSK, which brought in $4.36 billion in sales, in 2017. Asthma is a common effect of childhood vaccinations.

Author Kristen is documenting the charge that medical drug producers are essentially creating the diseases they then “treat” with their own medicines.

From my own experience with hospitals and doctors, I can say that, for the most part, medical personnel are unaware of any possible connection between vaccines, childhood diseases, and drugs purportedly designed to reduce the effects of the vaccines. These doctors and nurses would never believe there is a closed circle based on profits.

But there is more. The drugs used to treat the adverse effects of vaccines cause their own expanding disease outcomes—and then new drugs are developed to treat these illnesses.

The federal government, in collusion with media networks, has covered up the disastrous death numbers resulting from medical care. For years I’ve been documenting the research that reveals those numbers. For instance, see “Is US Health Really the Best in the World?” This review was written in 2000 by Dr. Barbara Starfield, at the time a revered expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. It was published on July 26, 2000, in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Starfield concluded that, every year in the US, the medical system killed 225,000 people. That would be 2.25 million deaths per decade. In a 2009 interview, Starfield told me that 225,000 was a conservative estimate…

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALEDEXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Three New Reasons to Question Vaccine Effectiveness Amid “Anti-Vaxxer” Censorship

Melissa Dykes Apr 05, 2019

There are a lot of reasons people question vaccines in a country with the most aggressive vaccine schedule in the world where citizens are not allowed to directly sue vaccine manufacturers for vaccine-induced injuries.

While the censorship rages against the so-called “anti-vax” community to shut down online content that even questions the safety and effectiveness of vaccines on various platforms including YouTube, Facebook, and even Amazon, it’s quietly coming out all over the place that our vaccines just really aren’t as effective as the CDC, Big Pharma, it’s lackeys (again, this), and the pro-vaccine crowd would have everyone believe.

Straight away, here are three reasons that have popped up in recent weeks why people are questioning the effectiveness of vaccines.


Fully Vaccinated Sailors & a Mumps Outbreak

The Business Insider reported March 29, 2019 that 27 US Navy sailors have been quarantined at sea for several months now due to a viral outbreak of what they are craftily referring to as a “probable case of the mumps”:

A US Navy warship deployed to the Persian Gulf has been stuck at sea for months due to a viral outbreak of what’s likely the mumps, and servicemembers are continuing to fall ill as the medical workers try to get the situation under control, Fifth Fleet told Business Insider Thursday.

If you were not aware, all branches of the US military require a full battery of vaccines for all new recruits. According to this chart on military vaccines administered for Basic Training and Officer Accession Training, updated Feb. 2019, “Measles Mumps and rubella (MMR) are administered to all recruits regardless of prior history”. Meaning, that even if these servicemembers received their required MMR vaccines as children, they would have been given yet another upon entering the Navy.

So… Why are they getting mumps?

Well, that depends who you ask. The Business Insider promptly changed its headline to add the word “rare”.


Meanwhile, what most people don’t know is that two former Merck virologists blew the whistle on the MMR vaccine’s effectiveness nearly a decade ago by filing a qui tam action lawsuit against Merck & Co. in August 2010.

As you can see from the suit, the former Merck scientists claim that “by using improper testing techniques and falsifying test data,” Merck is concealing the fact that the company knows specifically that its mumps vaccine is “far less than” the 95 percent effectiveness the company claims.


The introduction to the 2010 whistleblower lawsuit against Merck & Co.

Note that the suit is specifically about the efficacy of the mumps vaccine, including MMR II and ProQuad versions.

Not only that, but the former Merck virologists also claim this is a “decade-long scheme to falsify and misrepresent the true efficacy of its vaccine”. So this has allegedly been going on since at least 2000, and the lawsuit has been prodding along ever so slowly since 2010.

It’s 2019 now. I wonder how long they’re gonna drag this thing out, don’t you?

On an MMR aside, it was also reported in the March 2017 edition of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology (Vol. 55, Issue 3) that, “During the measles outbreak in California in 2015, a large number of suspected cases occurred in recent vaccinees” and “Of the 194 measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in 2015” a whopping “73 were identified as vaccine sequences”.

So there’s that. New technology is allowing researchers to sequence viruses and find out if they are wild — or from a vaccine.


CDC Announces in March 2019 that Children Are “Less Protected” by Whooping Cough Vaccines than They Once Were

On March 14 it was reported that CDC researchers analyzed lab samples from whooping cough patients between 2000 and 2013 and determined that the bacteria that causes whooping cough has undergone genetic changes over time. In short, the vaccination they are currently administering to children for pertussis, including in the DTaP vaccine, is no longer effective because the whooping cough bacteria has mutated. How long has that been the case? Hard to say.

And yet, the USA Today article still went on to claim, “The best protection against whooping cough remains the DTaP vaccine”.

Really? How does that work? (Oh, right…)

“We’re making the best use of the vaccine, while we’re frantically doing research to make a better one,” Dr. William Schaffner, professor of preventive medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, told NBC News. Not sure how they can “make the best use” out of a vaccine that they basically just admitted is pretty well worthless.

Dr. Schaffner also noted that a new vaccine for whooping cough “is nowhere near ready”.

CDC Says This Year’s Flu Vaccine Has an Overall Effectiveness of Just 47%

But take a look at this breakdown, as per Table 2 of the CDC’s Feb. 15, 2019 MMWR (click to enlarge):


While the overall adjusted effectiveness for all age groups comes out to 47 percent, the older one gets, the less effective the flu vaccine becomes. That 47 percent actually breaks out as 61 percent overall for ages six months to 17 years; 37 percent overall for 18-49 years; and just 24 percent overall for people age 50 and over.

CNN once again spoke to Dr. William Schaffner (guess he’s the go-to soundbite guy on vaccines for our nation’s mainstream media outlets this year?) who said, “those who get flu after receiving vaccine” (Wait, isn’t that supposed to be the point? Taking a vaccine to prevent the flu? Oh sorry, continuing — ) “are less likely to require hospitalization and are less likely to die of the illness”.

He followed that with, “The vaccine is not perfect, but give the vaccine credit for softening the blow.”

Is that the best spin they’ve got? How many other times in life is a 47 percent hailed as a success? That’s less than half a chance that the shot is worthless.

Then again, maybe they are comparing the 2019 flu vaccine to last year, when it was reported that the 2018 vaccine would only be 10 percent effective. At the announcement, doctors were still telling people that 10 percent is quote “better than nothing” and Dr. Pardis Sabeti, a Harvard professor and infectious disease expert, doubled down on CBS This Morning with, “In fact, in a year where it’s low effectiveness, it’s even more important that everybody get it so we can get as much resistance and we don’t allow the virus to thrive and grow and keep changing.” [emphasis added]

That logic is just… painful to behold.

Cui Bono?

Maybe now is a good time to point out that major pharmaceutical companies spend billions of dollars every year peddling their wares.

By billions, we’re talking nearly $30 billion in 2016 alone. Big Pharma forked over $9.6 billion to mainstream media outlets for the privilege of running direct-to-consumer (DTC) ads that year. That means American viewers saw an astounding 663,000 TV commercials for pharmaceuticals in 2016. You can barely make your way through a show on most major networks these days without at least one generic stock footage filled commercial where a friendly voiceover actor — after listing off a vague set of symptoms followed by a bunch of nightmarish side effects — implores us to become our own drug sales rep and ‘ ask our doctor today’ for whatever drug will supposedly make our lives as great as the people smiling their way through the generic stock footage.

The US is one of only two countries in the entire world where pharmaceutical companies are legally allowed to sell drugs directly to consumers (the other is Australia). Nowhere else on the planet is DTC pharmaceutical advertising allowed. Our government representatives, well funded by Big Pharma campaign contributions and surrounded by the industry’s lobbyists ($27.5 million in 2018), are well aware of the fact that this practice is a cost effective way of turning viewers into patients. A 2008 House Commerce Committee report states,

“Every $1 spent on direct-to-consumer advertising results in up to a $6 increase in sales. One study demonstrated that every $1,000 spent on direct-to-consumer advertisements resulted in 24 new prescriptions.”

Recently, an FDA medical adviser straight up told Yahoo! Finance, “Congress is owned by pharma.”

The point, however, is with numbers that substantial, there is no possible way for mainstream outlets to pretend with a straight face that they do not have a vested interest in how their reporters treat topics like, oh, I dunno, vaccines.

“If nearly $10 billion was spent on advertising, where did the other $20 billion go?” you might ask. Well, dear reader, it went to persuading doctors and other medical professionals (who may or may not get interviewed by media outlets for their “professional” opinion) of “the benefits of prescription drugs”.

The Bottom Line

The establishment figures that sell vaccines and the corporations that produce them act like vaccines are completely risk-free, so even if there’s only a ghost of a chance a vaccine will actually be effective as promoted or promised, then it’s worth it. The problem is, more and more people are realizing that vaccines are not 100 percent safe and without side effects. Those side effects are worth discussing, especially when we’re dealing with vaccines which the CDC has admitted are not as effective as they should be or Merck scientists-turned whistleblowers are litigating over.

The package inserts for vaccines list a wide and sometimes horrifying array of side effects. The MMR Insert, directly off Merck’s own website, says, “M-M-R II has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or potential to impair fertility.”

Ahem. Why not? Doesn’t that seem like an important thing to evaluate??

The government’s no-fault Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) has paid out $4 billion to vaccine injured Americans since it was set up in 1986. That’s the same year Congress signed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which in essence set up a system that does not allow Americans to directly sue vaccine manufacturers for vaccine injuries.


It’s probably not a coincidence that the schedule of vaccines went from seven injections and 24 doses in 1983 before this legislation was passed, to a whopping 51 injections of 70 doses by 2016.

Meanwhile, this is the kind of sentiment being posted on social media about so-called “anti-vaxxers”:


Where do I even begin?


Not sure which part makes my face melt more, the part where all the vaccinated kids got the flu anyway, or the part where the unvaccinated kid got the flu but “it’s leaving their body so they don’t get it”. pic.twitter.com/jy5NSASDg1

— Truthstream Media (@truthstreamnews) March 29, 2019


We the People have to be able to talk about vaccines.




  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Truth Be Told About Death, Disability & Vaccines Ineffectiveness With Validation From Peer Review Journals, Demographic Charts & Graphs

By  Catherine Frompovich


According to a New England Journal of Medicine article, Epidemic Measles in a Highly Vaccinated Population: During November, 1975, to May, 1976, measles occurred at a rate of 20.3 cases per 1000 in a purported immunized population, of whom historical and serologic survey revealed that 9 per cent had no history of either measles illness or vaccination and 18 per cent did not have detectable measles antibody. …. During a measles outbreak, more cases occurred in those receiving vaccine when less than 12 months old than in those vaccinated at !12 months (37 per cent vs. 9 per cent, P<0.001).

Source: New England Journal of Medicine

USA: Illinois—Measles Outbreak among Vaccinated High School Students

From December 9, 1983, to January 13, 1984, 21 cases of measles occurred in Sangamon County, Illinois. Nine of the cases were confirmed serologically. The outbreak involved 16 high school students, all of whom had histories of measles vaccination after 15 months of age documented in their school health records. Of the five remaining cases, four occurred in unvaccinated preschool children, two of whom were under 15 months of age, and one case occurred in a previously vaccinated college student. …. Editorial

Note: This outbreak demonstrates that transmission of measles can occur within a school population with a documented immunization level of 100%. CDC MMWR Weekly

Source: CDC

Measles Vaccine Deaths, 26 August 2010

India halts vaccine programme after the deaths of four children.

Vaccine programmes grind to a halt in India once more, when four children died after they received the measles vaccination in Lucknow. The four children were reported to have fainted soon after they were vaccinated and witnesses reported seeing the children’s eyes roll back as they began to have seizures. All of the children were under the age of two years of age, with the youngest being just six months. Sadly the children died before medical aid workers could reach them.

Source: One World Scam (The online URL address has been compromised and does not open.  However, when the original work was composed in 2010, it was a correct working URL address.)

Measles-Mumps-Rubella-Varicella Combination Vaccine and the Risk of Febrile Seizures

That is the title of a Pediatrics journal Volume 126, No. 1, July 2010, article written by MDs, PhDs, and MPHs from Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, HealthPartners Research Foundation, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, and Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which stated this conclusion in the Abstract:

Conclusions: Among 12- to 23-month-olds who received their first dose of measles containing vaccine, fever and seizure were elevated 7 to 10 days after vaccination.

Vaccination with MMRV results in 1 additional febrile seizure for every 2300 doses given instead of separate MMR + varicella vaccines. Providers who recommend MMRV should communicate to parents that it increases the risk of fever and seizure over that already associated with measles-containing vaccines.

Source: Pediatrics 2010, 126:e1-e8

[This article indicates an added health risk that parents are not aware of in addition to those risks associated with ‘traditional MMR’ vaccines: an apparent link with Autism.

SIDS: Sudden Infant Death Syndrome


In 1975, when Japan stopped vaccinating children under the age of 2 years dramatic improvements in their infant mortality occurred. Japan’s place in the world scale of infant mortality went from 17, a poor position, to number 1, the best performance. It is quite clear thatthe shift of the lower vaccination limit to 2 years resulted in a dramatic decrease in SIDS going quickly from a very high to the lowest rate of infant deaths in the world. Between 1970 and 1974, 37 infant deaths occurred after DPT vaccination in Japan and because of this the doctors in one prefecture boycotted the vaccination.

Source: CureZone

In 1975 Japan raised the minimum vaccination age to two years; this was followed by the virtual disappearance of cot death and infantile convulsions.

Source: Dr. Wile

USA: Tennessee

Diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-pertussis vaccination and sudden infant deaths in Tennessee.

Journal Pediatrics. 1982 Sep; 101(3):419-21

“At the 34th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics, presented a study linking the DPT shot with SIDS. Torch concluded: “These data show that DPT vaccination may be a generally unrecognized major cause of sudden infant and early childhood death, and that the risks of immunization may outweigh its potential benefits. A need for reevaluation and possible modification of current vaccination procedures is indicated by this study.” –Harris Coulter

Torch, W.S., 1982. Diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) immunization: a potential cause of the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). Neurology; 32(4): A169 abstract).

BCG Tuberculosis Vaccine

BCG Tuberculosis Vaccine  

In a Journal of Biological Standardization article [Volume 5, Issue 2, 1977, Pages 149-153], “Characterization of the Soviet BCG vaccine [tuberculosis prevention/control] and the occurrence of lymphadenitis [infection of lymph nodes/glands] in primarily vaccinated children,” A limited number of untoward reactions in children after BCG vaccination in the Soviet Union are described. They were mostly in the form of lymphadenitis but suppuration[formation/discharge of pus] and fistulation [fistula formed: abnormal passageway between two organs in the body or between an organ and exterior of the body The Free Dictionary by Farlex] were observed.

Pertussis [Whooping Cough] Vaccine


Isaac Srugo, et al. affiliated with various public health centers in Israel stated, We demonstrated B.pertussis infection in fully vaccinated children ages 2-3 years and 5-6 years who had contact with an infected child. We investigated whether younger or recently vaccinated children may be protected from classical clinical illness but remain susceptible to infection and become asymptomatic carriers.

Vaccinated children may be asymptomatic reservoirs for infection.

Source: CDC


The Times/The Sunday Times of July 7, 2006, discusses a British Medical Journal online article about whooping cough that says, Millions of British children have probably been infected with whoopping cough even though they have been immunized against it. A study has found that nearly two in five children who went to their GP with a persistent cough had suffered from whooping cough, though very few doctors diagnose it. The results suggest that the whooping cough vaccine is ineffective at preventing infection, but makes symptoms less severe—thereby concealing just how common it remains.


Times Online UK

Australia [Pertussis is on the rise!]

Whooping cough is on the rise in industrialised countries, despite long-standing vaccination programmes. Now researchers from the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, have an explanation for why: at least two strains of the bacteria that cause the infection have evolved to evade today’s vaccines.

According to The Daily Telegraph of Sydney, “the research team analysed more than 200 samples of the bacterium collected over the past 40 years in Australia and compared them with samples from Japan, Canada, USA and Finland”. They found that there are at least two strains that the vaccine may not protect against – known as MT27 and MT70.

At least in rich countries, many people may think that whooping cough – also known as pertussis – is a killer from a pre-vaccination era. The new study, which is published in this month’s edition of the journal Emerging Infectious Diseases, emphasises that incidence rates have been recently increasing in many industrialised countries. Prior to this study, scientists were unsure why.

Now it seems an upgrade to a new type of vaccine may be to blame. Up until 1997, a “whole-cell” vaccine was used before it was phased out over two years because of concerns about side effects. Since 1999, a new “acellular” vaccine has been used.

Source: New Scientist (The online URL address has been compromised and does not open.  However, when the original work was composed in 2010, it was a correct working URL address.)

The Netherlands [High rates despite widespread vaccination.]

In The Netherlands, as in many other western countries, pertussis vaccines have been used extensively for more than 40 years. Therefore, it is conceivable that vaccine-induced immunity has affected the evolution of B. pertussis. Consistent with this notion, pertussis has reemerged in The Netherlands, despite high vaccination coverage. Further, a notable change in the population structure of B. Pertussis was observed in The Netherlands subsequent to the introduction of vaccination in the 1950s. Finally, we observed antigenic divergence between clinical isolates and vaccine strains, in particular with respect to the surface-associated proteins pertactin and pertussis toxin. Adaptation may have allowed B. Pertussis to remain endemic despite widespread vaccination and may have contributed to the reemergence of pertussis in The Netherlands.

Source: Vaccines.Me


Pertussis (whooping cough) is a mandatorily notifiable disease in Slovenia and since 1959, there has been an active national immunization programme. ….Whooping cough is highly infectious, and before vaccination was introduced, almost all children became infected. However, vaccination does not prevent the infection or asymptomatic carriage, and immunity wanes after vaccination. ….Some hypotheses for this apparent vaccine failure are: antigenic shift so that the circulating strains and vaccination strains of Bordetella pertussis diverge and vaccine efficacy is reduced; other factors, alone or in combination. …. The extent to which bacterial polymorphisms affect vaccine efficacy probably depends on the vaccine used, on the proportion of polymorphic bacteria in the human population, and other factors.

Source: Eurosurveillance


An article in Acta Paediatrica states, “The purpose of this study was to find an answer to

the question of why whooping cough cases occur in Finland in spite of the high acceptance rate of DPT vaccine.

Source: Wiley Online Library

Anomalies Regarding Vaccines

[Vaccines don’t work in highly vaccinated populations!]

So why, then, does an article in the Journal of the American Medical Association make this statement: The risk of measles and pertussis is elevated in personal exemptors. Public health personnel should recognize the potential effect of exemptors in outbreaks in their communities, and parents should be made aware of the risks involved in not vaccinating their children. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/284/24/3145  when it’s been demonstrated in various countries that measles and pertussis vaccines don’t work even with highly vaccinated populations?

HPV Vaccines

HPV Vaccines
India: HPV Vaccines Deaths

Clinical trials using Gardasil® and Cervarix® vaccines were halted in India by the government on April 16, 2010 after the deaths of six tribal girls.

Source: Gozounlimited (The online URL address has been compromised and does not open.  However, when the original work was composed in 2010, it was a correct working URL address.)

Medical groups are accusing the Indian government for violating ethics and scientific logical proof in the drug company’s campaign to prove the vaccine works. …. There are over 120 side effects of Gardasil® and these quiet programs are not getting any media attention. …. Where are the studies and proof that the Gardasil® vaccine works? There is no proof and no testing and again like the H1N1 swine vaccine the mixture is not tested for causing cancer. The young children are being vaccinated 3 times with 3 doses and Gardasil has been proven deadly in Australia, Sri Lanki now in India and in the USA – children have died from this experimental Gardasil® and other vaccines.

Source: PoliticolNews (The online URL address has been compromised and does not open.  However, when the original work was composed in 2010, it was a correct working URL address.)

The reason the Indian government stopped the HPV vaccine from being distributed The HPV Vaccine: Science, Ethics and Regulation 28 november 27, 2010 vol xlv no 48 EPW Economic & Political Weekly.

A recent civil society-led investigation has highlighted serious ethical violations in a trial of the Human Papilloma Virus vaccine on girls in Khammam district in Andhra Pradesh. The findings are presented along with a review of clinical trials of the hpv vaccine in India and an analysis of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and Rules. Together they illustrate how the promotional practices of drug companies, pressure from powerful international organisations, [sic] and the co-option of, and uncritical endorsement by, India’s medical associations are influencing the country’s public health priorities.

For the 8-page report, see http://epw.in/epw/uploads/articles/15440.pdf  that in part states: “The girls and their parents were unaware that they were part of some kind of research.  They were under the impression that the government was providing an expensive and otherwise unaffordable vaccine free of cost, which would prevent “uterine” or “cervical cancer”. They did not know that they could have refused the vaccine. (The online URL address has been compromised and does not open.  However, when the original work was composed in 2010, it was a correct working URL address.)

Ireland: HPV Vaccine Problems

Ireland Reports 64 cases of “adverse reactions” to HPV vaccine [December 2010]

Young people are being put at risk of permanent damage to their health and welfare by the failure of the IMB and others in positions of authority to provide the full facts about this unsafe, unnecessary, ineffective and costly vaccine.” While these national vaccination programs, which are being carried out in the UK as well as Ireland, will make the drug’s manufacturer, Merck, billions in profit, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has warned that Gardasil® may be responsible for an unknown number of deaths.

Source: The One Click Group (The online URL address has been compromised and does not open.  However, when the original work was composed in 2010, it was a correct working URL address.)

USA: Gardasil® Deaths

Documents from the Food & Drug Administration obtained by Judicial Watch under the

Freedom of Information Act indicate that Gardasil, a cervical cancer vaccine manufactured by Merck that FDA officials fast-tracked for approval in 2006, may not be not as safe as its industry and government backers assured the public it was.

FDA records show that 16 new deaths (including four suicides) and 3,589 “adverse reactions” tied to Gardasil were reported in the 16 months between May 2009 and September 2010. The adverse reactions included 213 cases of permanent disability. The FDA also received 25 reports of paralyzing Guillain Barre Syndrome in young girls and women who had received the vaccine.

Read more at the San Francisco Examiner. (The online URL address has been compromised and does not open.  However, when the original work was composed in 2010, it was a correct working URL address.)

Memorial Site: Gardasil® Deaths

YouTube Videos: “Gardasil® Girls”
Thousands of Girls’ Stories about Gardasil® Adverse Reactions

Countries Reporting Gardasil® Adverse Reaction to CDC’s VAERS

Over 17,500 adverse reactions and 61 deaths have been reported to VAERS (estimated 1 to 10% of the population reporting). The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) has posted 272 VAERS reports of abnormal pap tests post-vaccination. Reports of deaths and injuries are now coming in from the United States, New Zealand, Australia, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain and India.

Source: EnnisLaw (The online URL address has been compromised and does not open.  However, when the original work was composed in 2010, it was a correct working URL address.)

Now, the ironic proof that vaccines/vaccinations have NOT saved the global population from infectious diseases ‘pandemics’ is found in the historical, statistical demographic records regarding human diseases as charted in the following information:

Natural Infectious Disease Declines vs. Vaccination Effectiveness and Dangers

Scroll down a few lines to

“Vaccines Did Not Save Us! Two Centuries of Official Statistics”

where you will find epidemiological statistics graphs for most of the infectious diseases.  There are eleven (11) full-color charts courtesy of Raymond Obomsawin, PhD, Senior Advisor – First Nations Centre National Aboriginal Health Organization

Please don’t stop there!

Continue on scrolling through all the remaining charts that indicate the HHS/CDC/FDA/Big Pharma lie told often enough has become a ‘medical truth’, i.e., vaccines save lives!

What happened to the natural decline in deaths from the waning of communicable infectious diseases in what can be considered cyclical patterns of human disease and immune response development long before the manufacture of vaccines?

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies.Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

We are seeing a big crack down in what the corporate media and government talking heads are calling 'anti-vaxers' ie anyone who questions the safety record of vaccines


But when we consider that $4 billion in compensation has already been paid out in US vaccine courts to vaccine damaged children and that they represent only a tiny fraction of vaccine damaged children who were permitted through the excessively stringent application process and that many children who suffer adverse effects from vaccines are either not reported to their doctors or are reported but the doctors then don't pass on that information to VAERs then we can begin to see that those compensated are only a small tip of a much larger iceberg


If we also take into account the fact that vaccines affect gene expression so that people may even develop ailments that they don't even link to vaccines in their own minds then we can consider that it is perfectly reasonable and in fact RESPONSIBLE for people to be discussing vaccine safety. The industry is not motivated to enure safety for a number of reasons because they want to safeguard their profits and are protected from litigation by laws that prevent people suing vaccine companies for damage caused by their products. The vaccine industry is unique in this regard


Further to this the big pharamaceutical companies can then make further profits from producing products that then treat the symtpoms of the ailments caused by their vaccines so there are a raft of reasons why the industry is not incentivised to ensure vaccine safety


So if they won't do it and the bought and paid for government regulators won't do it then the only people who can are the public themselves who can inform each other of the dangers.


If we consider that the government dleiberately increases poverty by allowing tax breaks for the rich while bailing out failed mega-corporations then how are we supposed to believe that the government actually cares about our health when it doesn't care about our economic health? Its not logical


While destroying our economic wellbeing they simultaneously insist that they care about vaccinating us to supposedly safeguard our health! It seems that vaccinating us is the only regard in which they care about us so shouldn't we find that a bit suspicious?


Here is Richie Allen discussing the law that the british parliament is proposing to censor the internet to shut down free speech over issues like vaccines. I personally believe as a rule of thumb in education not prohibition but with the internet if they must ban something then surely they should ban children from the internet? if the internet is such a toxic environment then surely the solution is to ban children from it instead of treating adults like children and micro-managing them?


We legislate against children smoking, drinking and driving to protect them from harm so why not also ban them from the internet? This would protect them from the toxic effects of social media and encourage them to pursue more healthy options with their time. Perhaps also children should be banned from taking mobile phones to school as they would enable children to then access the toxic internet outside of parental oversight and also enable cyber bullying and exposure to harmful content whilst also providing children with a constant distraction from their school work


The Richie Allen Show - Monday April 8th 2019


Edited by muir

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the world continues what appears to be a downward spiral in many ways there will be a cost for public health caused by the stress and anxiety of this modern world. This anxiety can often lead to problems like irritable bowel syndrome which many people may not associate with anxiety and as a result they will not seek to make the necessary changes in their life to alleviate stress and repair their body


Answer to Irritable Bowel Syndrome is in the mind, study shows

11 April 2019 • 12:01am
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is partly psychological and can be controlled better through mental training than with mainstream drugs, a new trial shows.

Hope of better treatment is at hand for thousands of sufferers after the research found that even telephone and web-based cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) had a major impact on symptoms.

The common gut condition affects up to 20 per cent of people and triggers abdominal pain, bloating and distressing altered bowel habits.

The causes of the disorder are unknown.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have a very toxic belief system.

Which you seem to be making incredibly strong by continually reinforcing it in as many ways as you can think of.

Good luck with that.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, ThisIsme said:

You have a very toxic belief system.

Which you seem to be making incredibly strong by continually reinforcing it in as many ways as you can think of.

Good luck with that.


ah so corporate forces aren't filling our world with toxic substances?


you don't want to know about them so that you can make informed choices about what you interact with?


Good luck with that

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites



This story in the papers this week about how statins aren't working for half the people they are given to. But lets consider that when doctors inform their patients that they have high cholesterol at least half of those patients will then make alterations to their diet and exercise routines to try and reduce their cholesterol so that even if no statins were prescribed we would likely see a reduction in the cholesterol of half of the patients anyway


So are the statins even responsible for the half of patients that do see changes to their cholesterol levels? If not then all that is being done is that millions of people are being exposed to the dangers of the side effects of statins and all at the  cost of the taxpayer who has to foot the bill for the NHS...


Statins lack desired effect for half of patients, study finds

Those who showed ‘sub-optimal’ response to cholesterol-lowering drugs also 22% more likely to develop heart disease

Press Association

Tue 16 Apr 2019 05.26 BST

Around half of patients who are prescribed statins do not see their cholesterol drop to desired levels within two years, new research suggests.

Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) aim for a 40% or more reduction in low density lipoprotein cholesterol from the treatment.

However a new study, published in journal Heart, found half of people (51%) had a “sub-optimal” response after 24 months on the drugs.

The researchers, from the University of Nottingham, analysed data from 165,411 patients who were prescribed statins in primary care between 1990 and 2016.

They were on average 62 years old when they began treatment.

A total of 84,609 patients had a “sub-optimal” response after two years and did not record a reduction in cholesterol of 40% or more.

The researchers note that a higher proportion of patients with a “sub-optimal” response were prescribed lower potency doses, compared with those with an “optimal” response.

Patients who did not reach the targeted levels were 22% more likely to develop cardiovascular disease than those who did respond well, the study found.


The researchers said the study provides “real world evidence” about statins.

“These findings contribute to the debate on the effectiveness of statin therapy and highlight the need for personalised medicine in lipid management for patients,” they wrote.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, muir said:


ah so corporate forces aren't filling our world with toxic substances?


you don't want to know about them so that you can make informed choices about what you interact with?



I'm not going to think about it, and obsess about it 24/7 though, what is the point in that?

I've got a lot better things to focus my energies on.

Edited by ThisIsme

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, ThisIsme said:


I'm not going to think about it, and obsess about it 24/7 though, what is the point in that?

I've got a lot better things to focus my energies on.


But do you believe that toxic substances are put into our environment by mega-corporations simply because they are pursuing profit or do you think it is by design?


Many years ago i used to believe the leftwing argument that the problem was simply 'the profit motive' which encouraged bad people to do bad things in order to make bumper profits for their corporations


But since then i have realised that so many products are made toxic when it isn't necessary to do that in order to boost profits. I have also learned how the elites are behind the eugenics movement (really they are into diseugenics because they are seeking to make people weaker and less able)


Some might argue that big pharma deliberately makes people chronically sick to ensure that they don't destroy their market and instead will be able to sell people products to deal with the symptoms of the problem they got from the initial poisoning but its not just big pharma creating a toxic environment for us to live in so that argument simply doesn't tell the whole story


The real story in my opinion is that the elites want the population weak and docile and culled. In fact historically there is precedent for this with the elites getting the best foodstuffs and the best flour whilst the peasants were given lesser products that did not give them as much vitality. This makes health and the deliberate sabotage of public health into an important area of the wider conspiracy that warrants its own examination

Edited by muir

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Antidepressant Commercials Were Honest - Honest Ads


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Massive uptick in 'early onset dementia' down to greater aluminium exposure?

Geoengineering releases high concentrations of TOXIC aluminum into the air, causing an increase in neurodegenerative diseases

Tuesday, April 16, 2019 by: Tracey Watson

Geoengineering, also known as climate engineering, is a controversial subject. Though many people dismiss it as nothing more than a conspiracy theory, there are many others who vehemently insist that governmental and other organizations are actively involved in attempts to manipulate the weather. Most of these experiments, they say, are directed at reversing the effects of so-called climate change, while some agencies have more sinister reasons for wanting to manipulate the weather, including a desire to control the ionosphere – and therefore radio communications – for military purposes.

In recent years, evidence has been mounting that perhaps geoengineering should not quickly be dismissed as conspiracy theory. Reports have emerged suggesting that increased amounts of aluminum are being detected in precipitation. If this heavy metal is present in the rain, it is certainly present in large quantities in the air. This ties in perfectly with the theory of geoengineering, which claims that aluminum is sprayed into the atmosphere as a way to control the rain.

Perhaps the most damning evidence supporting the geoengineering theory, however, is the massive increase in neurodegenerative diseases in recent years. According to the Alzheimer’s Association, the number of people dying from Alzheimer’s has increased by a staggering 145 percent since 2000. This is significant, because scientists have been warning for some time that the use of aluminum for geoengineering purposes would cause a spike in the number of people with neurodegenerative diseases.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
Lots of great studies on the effects of aluminium on health on this website:
Science Library Category:


Published: 2018
Aluminum and Mercury sulfates may contribute to neurodegeneration and progressive age-related functional decline such as Alzheimers Disease.


Synergism in aluminum and mercury neurotoxicity



Peter N Alexandrov, Aileen I Pogue, and Walter J Lukiw. Integrative Food, Nutrition and Metabolism, 2018 Volume 5(3): 1-7, doi: 10.15761/IFNM.1000214.


In this paper the authors analyzed the effects of aluminum and/or mercury, either alone or together, on their ability to induce inflammatory signaling in human cells and in a cell culture that is the same brain cell types targeted by the inflammatory neurodegeneration that characterizes Alzheimer’s disease. They report that neurotoxic metal sulfates obtainable via our environment or diet are significantly potent.



View Abstract


Environmental Toxins

Published: 2018

Read on here: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/research_category/aluminum/

Edited by muir

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who’s Behind The 5G Cull Of Humanity?

Posted on 03/19/2019

In 1999, HP scientist Richard P. Walker was granted a patent for what would become known as the internet of everything, now better known as 5G. Walker and the rest of his Silicon Valley colleagues had been fed military technology by Lockheed Martin and IBM.

HP spun off Agilent Technologies that same year as the vehicle through which the Walker patent would come to fruition. All ensuing patents pertaining to 5G would be mysteriously absorbed by Agilent, whether in the areas of surveillance, cybernetics, genetic engineering, human microchipping, or “wet works”.

The corporation pushing Walker’s Agilent patent forward is SERCO, a powerful British company close to Lockheed Martin, GE and BAE.  The first and last are the two biggest defense contractors in the world. All four are part of Crown Agents USA Inc. The golden share in SERCO was historically controlled through British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL) by Queen Elizabeth II.

In 2009 BNFL was shut down after spinning off its Westinghouse subsidiary. They had acquired Westinghouse in 1999, four years after Westinghouse bought CBS. BNFL’s nuclear plants had been privatized in 1996 and were taken over by British Energy. The same year BNFL shut down, British Energy was taken over by Electricite de France.

In 2000, Serco and Lockheed Martin took control of the UK’s Aldermaster weapons site. They also control two-thirds of the British Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE). The other third was owned by BNFL. During the past decade, AWE began exporting stolen US-enriched uranium from a Eunice, NM facility through its Urenco subsidiary. Urenco Executive Chairman Stephen Billingham came from British Energy. They were aided in this effort by the Highland Group, whose associates include the Clintons and Robert Mueller.

SERCO controls immigration and owns a pathology lab in the UK and runs detention centers, prisons and hospitals in Australia and New Zealand.  But the bulk of its income comes from no-bid US government contracts granted to it by members of Senior Executive Services (SES). SES consists of government insiders who, unlike a typical civil servant, cannot be fired after one year of service. President Obama appointed 8,000 of them.

SES members are in fact British Crown Agents who feed US government contracts, innovations, resources and sensitive information to their Crown bosses.

read on here https://hendersonlefthook.wordpress.com/2019/03/19/whos-behind-the-5g-cull-of-humanity/

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glastonbury resident makes an emotional appeal to the council amid 5G rollout fears

The council is being urged to "halt the installation of 5G"

By Anna GladwinDigital journalist
  • 11:29, 16 APR 2019

A Glastonbury man is continuing his appeal to the council to resist a 5G rollout.

Christopher Baker, an electromagnetic field consultant, spoke at a Glastonbury town council meeting on Tuesday, April 9 to raise his concerns of the potentially "debilitating" effects of 5G on the community.


He highlighted that 5G has been developed without “adequate testing of the long term effects” on human health and urged the councillors to “halt the installation of 5G” until the technology has been thoroughly evaluated.

"I care about the Glastonbury community, especially the young generation who are at a greater risk.", he said


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Robert Reich: The Monopolization of America


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

How just two hours’ screen time a day as a toddler can make children more likely to 'be badly behaved or have ADHD'

  • Canadian researchers studied screen time among children in 2,400 families
  • Two hours or more per day could lead to a seven times higher ADHD risk
  • The researchers recommend a maximum of 30 minutes per day for toddlers 

By Sam Blanchard Health Reporter For Mailonline

Published: 19:00, 17 April 2019 | Updated: 11:59, 18 April 2019

Toddlers who spend hours staring at screens every day are more badly behaved by the time they are five, a study has claimed.

Pre-school children who use smartphones, tablets and other gadgets for more than two hours a day are also seven times more likely to develop ADHD.

The screen time has a 'significant impact' on the child's development, researchers said as they warned parents need to cut it down.

One author of the study suggested this is because time spent looking at screens is time taken away from healthier activities such as sport or sleep. 


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep up the good work.  Let everyone else suffocate with their heads in the sand.


  • Like 2

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now