Jump to content
muir

Unpacking the false narratives

Recommended Posts

here's the article mentioned above about tribalism and the refusal to follow facts but instead to stick to the ethos of a certain tribe which in that article is outlined through a story about metoo but which we can see occurring in all areas of life as the progressive agenda advances:

 

‘Adorkable’ or rapist? Uncovered documents challenge Zoe Quinn’s abuse story (but #MeToo won’t care)

Published time: 12 Sep, 2019 07:32 Edited time: 12 Sep, 2019 07:38
In 2012, feminist activist Zoe Quinn called her romance with game creator Alec Holowka “adorkable”. Seven years later, she decried the same relationship as abuse. The troubled Holowka was then disgraced and took his own life.

There is something touchingly naïve about journalists at Canadian alternative news site The Postmillenial going on an old-fashioned internet deep dive to compare Quinn’s contemporaneous accounts of her relationship with indie developer Holowka, with her current description. As if they assume that her credibility with the mainstream media and #MeToo campaigners rests on facts, the psychological plausibility of her narrative, or personal trustworthiness, consistency and objectivity.

Nonetheless, it all makes for interesting –if somewhat macabre– reading now.

 

A quick summary of the accusations. Quinn, already a lightning rod for her originating role in the online culture war Gamergate, made allegations against Holowka, renowned for breakout indie hit Night in the Woods, posted on her Twitter late last month.

She alleged that Holowka “physically confined” her to his apartment in Winnipeg, where she flew out to stay with him, that he'd “degraded” and “screamed” at her, was “mean and violent” during sex, before she was rescued by a friend who “helped her get out” and fly back to Toronto. He also purportedly inserted himself into her career, by taking over the programming of the text game she had been writing, a romantic satire called It’s Not OK, Cupid, despite her “protests.”

Yet, a podcast from the time suggests a different emotional hue, as the couple bashfully recall their online meet-cute, their shared feminist ideals – such as encouraging more women coders in gaming – and both use “adorkable” to describe their fast-blooming relationship.

Meanwhile, her constant tweets from her time in Winnipeg suggest not a man wrestling in on a woman’s project, but endless days of fulfilling and exhausting work done side-by-side.

“When a boy game dev and a girl game dev love each other verrry [sic] much, they smash their heads together and a game comes out,” reads a typical message, screenshotted from Quinn’s Twitter, which has been locked to outsiders in the aftermath of Holowka’s death.

Nor is there any confirmation of Quinn’s fear-induced getaway. Instead, she discusses her flight from Winnipeg more than a week in advance, and her public exchanges with Holowka on social media date to well after she had returned to Toronto in May 2012 (when she dumped him by email).

So, what does this prove? Nothing, definitively. Many women in abusive relationships put on a brave face in front of others while suffering in private, and Quinn was careful in her since-deleted messages to mention that Holowka, who by all accounts was plagued by mental illness and mentioned thoughts of suicide, “acted normal in public.” Or maybe Quinn did not fully realize the extent of the abuse until she got home, and was able to evaluate her relationship. Or perhaps she lacked the necessary awareness and bravery altogether to process her past until her multi-page Twitter exposé.

But the main point remains; that actual details do not matter. Even by virtue of these emails it had been possible to somehow prove what her plentiful social media detractors had accused Quinn of. Namely, that she had opportunistically misrepresented a failed but not strictly abusive dalliance from years ago, in a bid for attention and sympathy, and thus pushed a man she knew was emotionally unstable towards suicide, the path that Holowka chose on August 31, shortly after being dismissed from his latest project due to the allegations.

What then? Within the paradigm of “Believe all women” that is embraced by #MeToo, it changes nothing. A woman can be in a consensual coupling, but the moment she decides that it wasn’t such, she is the victim. A woman can be in a complex, mutually-abusive relationship, but whatever her view of it is the final view. All prior facts can point to a woman being armed with a less convincing narrative than the man she is accusing, and yet her account is, by default, accepted over his.

Sifting through the facts to make a balanced or nuanced judgement –even asking Holowka for his side while he still could give it– is anathema to the #MeToo movement. The entire point is blind, unquestioning faith, an abandonment of truth-seeking.

In fact, there seems to be a perverse and tribal tendency here – the more toxic the person on the movement’s own side of the cause is, the harder they get defended, as a matter of principle. Despite countless accounts of Quinn’s dubious conduct and integrity – regardless of what happened in Winnipeg - each time she gets into a new pickle her supporters double down. Inconvenient facts are tossed away or aggressively countered.

One example: most of the mainstream media has stayed awkwardly silent on Holowka’s suicide (despite covering the allegations). A column in Wired bemoaned “male fragility” – the feminist equivalent of the “snowflake” putdown. Apparently, Holowka’s very real death was about keeping women “hostage” to male feelings. That hardening, that lack of empathy, that cruelty is only possible for decent people when you are no longer aware of your biases. At best what we will get now is a treatise on how questioning the victim is just another form of male abuse.

There are many scenarios where such self-serving tribalism is harmless – Messi or Ronaldo – or at least socially acceptable – Trump or Clinton. But bringing justice into private lives is not one of them.

By Igor Ogorodnev, senior writer at RT

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/468636-zoe-quinn-holowka-adorkable-metoo/

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The climate change boondoggle

 

The narrative being promoted by the corporate media and by the globalised institutions like the united nations is that the world is facing catastrophic climate disaster and that in order to save ourselves from this we must accept a radical overhaul of society.

 

I personally don't like how things are at the moment because I don't agree with the corporate-monopolist neoliberal system where the corporate elites use the state to control the market in their own favour. But just because I want change doesn't mean that I'm going to blindly jump on any bandwagon that comes along calling for change. I want to know first who is steering that bandwagon and what their agenda is!

 

The troubles we have in the world at the moment like pollution and inequality have all been created by the corporate elites and yet they are the very same people saying that we must now change society. Their solution is further CENTRALISATION which is to say more of the same that got us into this mess in the first place. They want a technocracy that will micro-manage every single joule of energy put out by every single individual on the planet. Their vision for the future is one of vast mega cities where the human population have been turned into cyborgs and crammed into high density 'smart' housing while the land is cleared of people and turned over to robotic drone farming which inevitably will require widespread use of GMO's and corporate produced chemicals.

 

This is not progress! It is simply a re-ordering of the prison to make it even more locked down and in order to trick people into going along with this the elite are using their leftwing of the dialectic to with one hand promote 'social justice' issues while with the other hand promoting 'climate change' issues so that people conflate the two and believe that if those politicians are speaking about social justice they must be good guys and are therefore to be trusted on the climate change issues

 

But if you breakdown a lot of the 'social justice' issues they are not really about handing more power to individuals; instead they are really about breeding contempt among various factions of the population for the status quo so that they are psychologically prepared to accept the shift to technocracy.

 

This is a false narrative. A true narrative would be to take an honest look at what is really damaging the environment like for example corporate polluting and globalism with for example the container ships that drive globalism being the biggest gas guzzlers out there!

 

A true narrative would be to start talking about localism as the solution to the problems caused by globalism. This would lead to real 'sustainability' which is one of the buzzwords of the authoritarian-left wing of the conspiracy. Localism allows people to work with their local environment to use best what they have locally so that they create their own foodstuffs and then become less vulnerable to fluctuations in the global market. Localism would also see an acceptance of local culture which invariably springs out of place as that is the true 'diversity' of the world. When the authoritarian-left use the term 'diversity' they actually mean the destruction of diversity because they mean the piling of as many people from different places as they can into the same geographic locale which inevitably will disconnect them from place and lead to their children abandoning their authentic culture in favour of a corporate-psuedo culture which is of course shaped by the corporate elites who would then lead everyone to homogeity and blandness NOT diversity.

 

They have misapropriated words and its time to expose this and reclaim those words

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, muir said:

The climate change boondoggle

 

The narrative being promoted by the corporate media and by the globalised institutions like the united nations is that the world is facing catastrophic climate disaster and that in order to save ourselves from this we must accept a radical overhaul of society.

 

I personally don't like how things are at the moment because I don't agree with the corporate-monopolist neoliberal system where the corporate elites use the state to control the market in their own favour. But just because I want change doesn't mean that I'm going to blindly jump on any bandwagon that comes along calling for change. I want to know first who is steering that bandwagon and what their agenda is!

 

The troubles we have in the world at the moment like pollution and inequality have all been created by the corporate elites and yet they are the very same people saying that we must now change society. Their solution is further CENTRALISATION which is to say more of the same that got us into this mess in the first place. They want a technocracy that will micro-manage every single joule of energy put out by every single individual on the planet. Their vision for the future is one of vast mega cities where the human population have been turned into cyborgs and crammed into high density 'smart' housing while the land is cleared of people and turned over to robotic drone farming which inevitably will require widespread use of GMO's and corporate produced chemicals.

 

This is not progress! It is simply a re-ordering of the prison to make it even more locked down and in order to trick people into going along with this the elite are using their leftwing of the dialectic to with one hand promote 'social justice' issues while with the other hand promoting 'climate change' issues so that people conflate the two and believe that if those politicians are speaking about social justice they must be good guys and are therefore to be trusted on the climate change issues 

 

But if you breakdown a lot of the 'social justice' issues they are not really about handing more power to individuals; instead they are really about breeding contempt among various factions of the population for the status quo so that they are psychologically prepared to accept the shift to technocracy.

 

This is a false narrative. A true narrative would be to take an honest look at what is really damaging the environment like for example corporate polluting and globalism with for example the container ships that drive globalism being the biggest gas guzzlers out there!

 

A true narrative would be to start talking about localism as the solution to the problems caused by globalism. This would lead to real 'sustainability' which is one of the buzzwords of the authoritarian-left wing of the conspiracy. Localism allows people to work with their local environment to use best what they have locally so that they create their own foodstuffs and then become less vulnerable to fluctuations in the global market.

 

Localism would also see an acceptance of local culture which invariably springs out of place as that is the true 'diversity' of the world. When the authoritarian-left use the term 'diversity' they actually mean the destruction of diversity because they mean the piling of as many people from different places as they can into the same geographic locale which inevitably will disconnect them from place and lead to their children abandoning their authentic culture in favour of a corporate-psuedo culture which is of course shaped by the corporate elites who would then lead everyone to homogeity and blandness NOT diversity.

 

They have misapropriated words and its time to expose this and reclaim those words

 

 

 

They are using the false narrative of Climate Change while this is actually taking place, much earlier than all time records have recorded, soon the globalists will have too many false fronts to try and promote and will be left reeling in their words as people on the ground set the record straight.

 

Localism cannot take shape until the next day reality is on its knees, so those is a local setting can get into making things that they got from the globalist beforehand, and start creating a small percentage of what they need in house for a more stable income and or savings.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By order of the peaky blinders!

 

***SPOILERS!!!*** In the recent episode of the aforementioned TV programme the jewish character played by Tom hardy is found to have survived being shot in the face by tommy and is laying low in margate while he recovers from his injuries. Tommy goes to visit him and pauses for a moment at the front door where it says at the threshhold 'lethe' before he then crosses into the house to make his bargain with solomons.

 

This is a freemasonic reference as the freemasons say that we have all drunk from the waters of forgetfulness which are the river lethe of greek myth when we enter into this reality and by doing so forget our true immortal nature. The crossing of the waters of lethe are part of ritual initiation

 

It's also interesting that the writer has made his lead character a gypsy as the author Andrew Sinclair, himself of the illuminati sinclair family, claims that gypsies were in the baggage trains of the knights templar [crypto-jews and ceremonial qabalistic magicians] who were obviously running a large trading network that spanned from the levant to europe. Sinclair claims that the gypsies were the metal workers who mended the tools and weapons of the templars. To this day many gypsies are involved in the scrap metal trade. This is why the gypsies are famed for their tarot readings as tarot is really just qabalah which is what is at the centre of templarism (now freemasonry).

 

The most recent series of peaky blinders sees tommy squaring off against oscar mosely the leader of the british fascists at the time of hitlers rise with mosley making some very pointed speeches which blamed the jewish bankers for the worlds problems.

 

I find it interesting that in these times of political upheval and revelation that a BBC TV series chooses to create a bogeyman who uses some talking points that are very poignant today. A coincidence? Or sophisticated propaganda designed to shape the perceptions of the public, many of which unconsciously allow the TV to shape their perceptions of history?

 

Perhaps a more accurate narrative would expose how the jewish bankers on wall street actually funded the rise of hitler as shown by prof sutton in his series of three books that looked at how wall st funded the bolsheviks (led by jews) in russia followed by nationalist socialism in germany as a counter to the bolshevik threat while in the exact same year that hitler was elected (1933), FDR was also elected in the USA to the presidency. FDR then pushed his 'new deal' which sutton demonstrates to be a ploy by wall st to create corporate monopolies. In fact it was this wall st cabal of jewish bankers who created the large german cartels that then enabled hitler to build his war machine.

 

Of course none of these hard facts will be allowed in any BBC drama as they might disrupt the simplified narratives of jewish state-socialists= GOOD and anyone who questions them= bad. That's not to say that mosely was good just to show that the BBC has put moselys face onto the idea that something is amiss in wall street thereby smearing by association anyone who has questions to ask about wall st's role in the rise of hilter...

 

Churchill meanwhile is portrayed sympathetically when he was involved in dragging britain into world war I due to his part in the lusitania sinking conspiracy in which the ship did indeed carry armaments. Churchill also allowed the british inhabitants of coventry to be bombed by the luftwaffe so that the germans wouldn't figure out that their engima code machine had been cracked. Any depiction that portrays churchill in favourable light has to be suspect! It might make good TV but lets hope people don't accept it as gospel truth nor lose sight of the fact that the protagonists are not good people but rather petty amoral gangsters

Edited by muir

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

herd immunity....

Multiple Studies Show MMR & Pertussis Vaccine Failure – They’re Not Even Working

Published 2 days ago on October 8, 2019

By Arjun Walia

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Multiple studies show quite clearly that there is a problem with the MMR & Pertussis vaccines, and many others. What we may be seeing is a failing vaccine, and not a a failure to vaccinate.

  • Reflect On:

    With the amount of information clearly showing how some vaccines are ineffective and in many cases causing injury, how is mandatory vaccination at all justifiable?

We are living in a day and age where there is a tremendous divide occurring among the populace on multiple subjects, one of them being vaccination. We are heavily marketed with the idea that vaccines are completely safe for everybody, that they save lives, and that the science is settled. This type of narrative comes straight from pharmaceutical companies and federal health regulatory agencies like the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).

 

However, there is a lot of science that continues to emerge which summarily discount the claims being made by pharmaceutical companies and federal health regulatory agencies. Not only are there contradictions in their science, but also extreme corruption within these companies and agencies has been exposed on multiple occasions.  One great example would be senior CDC scientist Dr. William Thompson, who blew the whistle in 2014 on data corruption by executives within the CDC with regards to falsified data pertaining to the MMR vaccine. One study which purports to show no link between the vaccine and autism had some of its data sets removed, which otherwise showed a strong correlation between the vaccine to autism.

Two years after that more than a dozen senior CDC scientists anononymously put out a paper (the SPIDER papers) in which they expressed their concerns about the corruption within the agency, its complacency, and undue corporate influence on the published science. The revolving door that exists between these agencies contributes to the continued corruption. As an example, CDC Director from 2002-2009 Julie Gerberding became the head Merck’s vaccines division, which came with a $2.5 million annual salary and $5 million in stock options.

The Failing MMR Vaccine

A study published as far back as 1994 in the JAMA Internal Medicine details quite clearly that the Measles vaccine does not and has not worked:

We found 18 reports of measles outbreaks in very highly immunized school populations where 71% to 99.8% of students were immunized against measles. Despite these high rates of immunization, 30% to 100% of all measles cases in these outbreaks occurred in previously immunized students. In our hypothetical school model, after more than 95% of schoolchildren are immunized against measles, the majority of measles cases occur in appropriately immunized children.

The apparent paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons. Because of the failure rate of the vaccine and the unique transmissibility of the measles virus, the currently available measles vaccine, used in a single-dose strategy, is unlikely to completely eliminate measles. The long term success of a two-dose strategy to eliminate measles remains to be determined. (source)

There are many examples up to the present day that clearly indicate the failure of the vaccine. For example, A study published in the highly authoritative Bulletin of the World Health Organization looked at recent measles occurrences throughout China and found that there were 707 measles outbreaks in the country recorded between 2009 and 2012, with a steep upward trend in 2013. “The number of measles cases reported in the first 10 months of 2013 – 26,443 – was three times the number reported in the whole of 2012.” This is odd considering that since  2009 “…the first dose of measles-virus-containing vaccine has reached more than 90% of the target population.” (source)

A study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases – whose authorship includes scientists working for the Bureau of Immunization, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA – looked at evidence from the 2011 New York measles outbreak, which showed that individuals with prior evidence of measles vaccination and vaccine immunity were both capable of being infected with measles and infecting others with it (secondary transmission). (source)

During the measles outbreak in California in 2015, a large number of suspected cases occurred in recent vaccines. Of the 194 measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in 2015, 73 were identified as vaccine sequences. The Pharma-owned media generated high public anxiety, a form of fear mongering that led the public to demonize unvaccinated children, who were falsely perceived as the spreaders of this disease. Rebecca J. McNall, a co-author of the published report, is a CDC official in the Division of Viral Diseases who had the data proving that the measles outbreak was in part caused by the vaccine. It is evidence of the vaccine’s failure to provide immunity. (source)

https://www.collective-evolution.com/2019/10/08/health-multiple-studies-show-mmr-pertussis-vaccines-failures-theyre-not-even-working/

 

Edited by muir

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/15/2019 at 1:20 PM, muir said:

A REAL left that sought to empower the common man and woman on the street instead of delivering them into the hands of oligarchic tyrants would seek to preserve individual liberty and the freedom to speak truth to power

 

A deceased uncle, an original hippy, was this type of leftist.  He once told me that I was so far right, and he being so far left that we met in the middle. 

The last thing elites want are people of differing political stripes uniting behind freedom and truth.  Luckily for them, keeping people at each other's throats while they act out depraved fantasies in various global lairs is a trivial task. 

 

These false narratives are a complicated web.  Each question that gets answered leads to a hundred more.
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, JacksonsGhost said:

A deceased uncle, an original hippy, was this type of leftist.  He once told me that I was so far right, and he being so far left that we met in the middle.

 

The same applies with the authoritarians in that the far right authoritarians and the far left authoritarians are both driven by the desire to centralise their power and control over everyone else

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely, there are some political tests on the internet that asks some questions then display your results on the standard x, y graph format.  One axis charts left to right orientation while the other charts authoritarian versus libertarian tendencies.  For example, neocons are right oriented authoritarians.   

I remember having dinner with an ex and her mother along with her mother's significant other.  I was the only conservative leaner in our group of four.  We ended up in an argument over my country's stupid policies enacted after the 911 hoax, specifically the TSA.  Her mother and I were a tag team defending liberty against the other two's willingness to be molested in order to board an airplane.  This anecdote is illustrative of the cultural divide we're all facing.  This is exactly where the elites need us to be. 

The multitude of examples you have provided to us in this thread are nearly a galactic scale line of connecting dots.  The amount of crazy things being thrown at us at once is engineered to overwhelm. 

What do we need to do to step outside of ourselves to counter their strategies and tactics?   I've found it easier to weaken the authoritarian streak in folks via persuasion versus trying to convert someone to my incomplete belief system.  Left vs. right does not bother me.  We really do have more in common than not.   Be the one who tosses sand into the gears.
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Greta Thunberg and the green crusade

 

''One day in May 1212 there appeared at Saint-Denis, where King Philip of France was holding his court, a shepherd boy of about twelve years old called Stephen, from the small town of cloyes in the orleannais. He brought with him a letter for the king, which, he said, had been given to him by christ in person, who had appeared to him as he was tending his sheep and who had bidden him go and preach the crusade. King philip was not impressed by the child and told him to go home. But stephen, whose enthusiasm had been fired by his mysterious visitor, saw himself as an inspired leader who would succeed where his elders had failed. For the past fifteen years preachers had been going round the countryside urging a christian crusade against the moslems of the east or of spain or against the heretics of languedoc. It was easy for a hysterical boy to be infected with the idea that he too could be a preacher and could emulate peter the hermit, whose prowess had during the past century reached a legendary grandeur. Undismayed by the kings indifference, he began to preach at the very entrance to the abbey of saint denis and to announce that he would lead a band of children to the rescue of christendom...''

 

-'A History of the Crusades III: The Kingdom of Acre' by Steven Runciman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cont...

 

''The seas would would dry up before them, and they would pass, like moses through the red sea, safe to the Holy Land. He was gifted with an extraordinary eloquence. Older folk were impressed, and children came flocking to his call. After his success he set out to journey round france summoning the children; and many of his converts went further afield to work on his behalf. They were all to meet there together at Vendrome in about a month's time and start out from there to the east.

Towards the end of June the children massed at Vendome. Awed contemporaries spoke of thirty thousand, not one over twelve years of age. There were certainly several thousand of them, collected from all parts of the country, some of them simple peasants, whose parents in many cases had willingly let them go on their great mission. But there were also boys of noble birth who had slipped away from home to join stephen and his following of 'minor prophets' as the chroniclers called them. There were also girls among them, a few young priests, and a few older pilgrims, some drawn by piety, others, perhaps, from pity, and others, certainly to share in the gifts that were showered upon them all''

 

12293930-6923023-Environmental_protestor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ouroborus:

 

Ouroboros-dragon-serpent-snake-symbol.jp

 

masonic apron buckle:

 

masonic-apron-snack-for-belt-gold-2000x1

 

extinction rebellion standard:

 

777px-Extinction_Symbol%252C_Extinction_

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Runcimans crusades cont...

 

''When the blessing of friendly priests had been given, and when the last sorrowing parents had been pushed aside, the expedition started out southward. nearly all of them went on foot. But stephen, as befitted the leader, insisted on having a gaily decorated cart for himself, with a canopy to shade him from the sun. At his side rode boys of noble birth, each rich enough to possess a horse. No one resented the inspired prophet travelling in comfort. On the contrary, he was treated as a saint, and locks of his hair and pieces of his garments were collected as precious relics''

 

Greta-Thunberg-in-barca-a-vela-verso-New

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This narrative of fake liberalism promoting deep state warmongering - one of deceit and duping the gullible all along, Ellen in cahoots with the Bushes. Hilarious really, if there hadnt been so much death and destruction on the part of these creeps.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The green crusade continued....(excerpts from runcimans crusades series)

 

12573064-6949843-Extinction_Rebellion_pr

 

''The citizens of marseilles greeted the children kindly. Many found houses in which to lodge. Others encamped in the streets. Next morning the whole expedition rushed down to the harbour to see the sea divide before them. When the miracle did not take place, there was bitter disappointment. Some of the children turned against stephen, crying that he had betrayed them, and began to retrace their steps. But most of them stayed on by the seaside, expecting each morning that god would relent. After a few days two merchants of marseilles, called, according to tradition, Hugh the Iron and William the pig, offered to put ships at their disposal and to carry them free of charge, for the glory of god, to palestine. Stephen eagerly accepted the offer. Seven vessels were hired by the merchants, and the children were taken aboard and set out to sea. Eighteen years passed before there was any further news of them''

-Steven Runciman, 'A History of the Crusades III: The Kingdom of Acre'

 

190428-Extinction-Rebellion-pink-boat.jp

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

green crusade continued...

 

What I'm interested to know was who was stephens handler? Runciman says that stephen was handed a note by jesus himself! So it seems that someone who wanted to provoke another crusade was traveling around the country trying to manipulate gullible children and in stephen he found his useful idiot. It seems the person even impersonated jesus! Also Runciman says that some priests accompanied the children and perhaps they are the puppeteers. lets continue the story:

 

image036.jpg&f=1&nofb=1

 

''In the year 1230 a priest arrived in France from the east with a curious tale to tell. He had been, he said, one of the young priests who had accompanied stephen to marseilles and had embarked with them on the ships provided by the merchants. A few days out they had run into bad weather, and two of the ships were wrecked on the island of san pietro, off the south-west corner of sardinia, and all the passengers were drowned. The five ships that survived the storm found themselves soon afterwards surrounded by a saracen squadron from africa; and the passengers learned that they had been brought there by arrangement, to be sold into captivity. They were all taken to Bougie, on the algerian coast. Many of them were bought on arrival and spent the rest of their lives in captivity there. Others, the young priest among them, were shipped on to egypt, where frankish slaves fetched a better price. When they arrived at alexandria the greater part of the consignment was bought by the governor, to work on his estates. According to the priest there were still about seven hundred of them living. A small company was taken to the slave markets of bagdhad; and there eighteen of them were martyred for refusing to accept islam. More fortunate were the young priests and the few that were literate. The governor of egypt, al adil's son al-kamil, was interested in western languages and letters. He bought them and kept them as interpreters, teachers and secretaries, and made no effort to convert them to his faith. They stayed on in cairo in a comfortable captivity; and eventually this one priest was released and allowed to return to france. he told the questioning parents of his comrades all that he knew, then disappeared into obscurity....It was not the little children that would rescue jerusalem''

-Steven Runciman, 'A History of the crusades III: The kingdom of Acre'

 

ExtinctionRebellion2505-1.jpg?w968&f=1&n

 

 

2.42362464.jpg&f=1&nofb=1

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

''The unknowing would never associate fascism with environmentalism, would they. They would never guess that a fake green agenda could be the Trojan horse for the final take-over.''

Zero Carbon, 5G Denial and Green-Fascism

By JULIAN ROSE

 

The high profile use of this zero carbon goal, particularly via Green New Deal proponents upping the pressure on governments to follow-through their commitments to the Paris climate change treaty, carries with it the overtones of a global crusade. And the missionary zeal behind global crusades is often drummed-up by people and institutions guided by dogma rather than by conscious and humanitarian instincts for a better world.

An exploration of the roots of the ambition to achieve 'zero carbon' reveals a direct link to 'climate action'/'climate emergency' measures promoted via Extinction Rebellion, advocates of a Green New Deal and the 'sustainable development' edicts of the United Nation's Agenda 21 – now renamed  Agenda 2030. 

 

The green movement that jumped onto the band-wagon called 'stop global warming' has, however, got an even bigger problem to deal with, one which is far more devious than the familiar 'art of compromise' that has undone so many once well intentioned movements. 

This is the fact that 'the problem' it is addressing is an invention – not a reality. An invention pushed into prominence by the United Nation's body called the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. A body with direct links to the most powerful grouping of corporate institutions on the planet with the addition of a coterie of multi millionaires determined to set the planet's top-down 'green' agenda for the indefinite future. 

An agenda that has little or nothing to do with the environment - and everything to do with the survival of the neo-liberal 'big' global economy, as admitted by Dr Otmar Edenhofer, head of Working Group 3 of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 

The actual causes of climactic change – and yes, it is happening – are to be found in a composite of man made and natural events, ranging from HAARP's gross interference via heating-up the ionosphere, atmospheric aerosol geoengineering (chemtrails), the residues of perpetual war, natural solar activity, the Pole shift, a weakening magnetosphere, intense electro smog and ozone depletion.

CO2 making only a tiny contribution.
 

Zero Carbon is the official call we are all being told to get behind, and it is the one taken up, directly or indirectly, by Extinction Rebellion, the Greta Thunberg school of youth indoctrination, the proponents of Green New Deal and the telecoms pushing forward a blanket 5G network. 

Smelling big money, politicians are happy to go along with it too. Especially since Mark Carney, director of the Bank of England, announced that any businesses that do not conform to the zero carbon 'green' criteria will be blocked from access to new loans, while those that do can expect high financial rewards. Yes, all the big multinational/transnational corporations are being invited to the table and are running to get the best seats. It's a heist. 

A heist, led by 'the green movement' itself. What an irony! The supposedly anti neo-liberal globalist movement that was supposed to point the way to a decentralised, localised and human scale form of people power, taking sound ecological practices as the foundation for a world that would finally shift 'the god of money' off its throne to be replaced by the cultivation of respect for the laws of nature and a human scale economy operating 'as if people mattered'.

When one takes a serious look at the scale of our current deviation from the path of truth, it swims before one's eyes like a virtual reality dream (nightmare). The zero carbon world we are being exalted to adapt to, when viewed through this virtual google 3D head set, reveals scenes of a fenced-off brave new world of 'rewilded' landscapes on the one hand – and sterile 5G driven 'smart cities' on the other. All of it overseen by Amazon/Google 'Cloud' powered smart grids monitoring and controlling an ever more dystopian robotic world, increasingly resembling a totalitarian prison camp.

Ray Kurzwell would surely feel quite at home with the ushering-in of such artificial intelligence led systems finally achieving their place as the 'new brain'; having successfully usurped the human one.  

Zero Carbon suggests to me that the cyborg 5G smart city is the Agenda 2030 'sustainable development' carbon free omega point towards which we are all being ushered at brake-neck speed. With Caroline Lucas, Greta Thunberg, Gail Bradbrook, Yanis Verufakis and others leading 'the rebellion' while holding high the flag of a Green-Fascist New World Order.

Eco-fascism has arrived on our doorstep and its appeal has become almost irresistible to those who combine a hyped-up fear of 'the end of the world' with belief in the rhetoric of bought-out climatologists, ambitious fake green con men (and women) and the political figurehead puppets of the deep state.

The unknowing would never associate fascism with environmentalism, would they. They would never guess that a fake green agenda could be the Trojan horse for for the final take-over. Yet the fascist take-over that failed under Hitler and Mussolini, has crept steadily and stealthily forward under the dictatorship of the giant banking fiefdoms of the past half century – and it is precisely these institutions that are now falling in line to back a Green New Deal.

 

read full piece here: https://www.davidicke.com/article/557034/zero-carbon-5g-denial-green-fascism

Edited by muir

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Al Baghdadi is dead.....again!

 

So big story coming out of the trump camp is that the leader of ISIS is dead however old al bagdadi has been killed more times than osama bin laden with rumours of his demise circulating on a number of previous occasions.

 

However this death is this time being given the official stamp treatment by the trump-camp in the same way that obama did for bin laden with photos released of the politicians waiting dramatically while special forces teams were sent in to takeout the big bad bogeymen (see pic below).

 

Note that last time there was no body to show the public because they apparently buried it at sea and this time there is no body because apparently this time he blew himself to smithereens.

 

So perhaps what this truly signals is that the US deep state is shutting down its ISIS programme in the same way that it shut down its Al Qaeda programme or rather morphed that programmed into the ISIS programme.

 

This then leads us to question: if they morphed al qaeda into ISIS by staging a theatrical 'death' of bin laden then what are they planning to morph ISIS into with this media-theatre demise of their latest cardboard cut out villain?

 

Will we see 'islamic extremism' now morph into a new force operating in a new theatre and is it possible that the new theatre could be europe itself? If the mercenaries that the CIA and Mossad and the house of saud used to fill the ranks of al qaeda and then ISIS are now unemployed what new task will they set them?

 

Will they simply pack them off to europe to carry out a wave of new terror attacks that would see the EU and Britain have to evolve to face a new threat that would require a greater integration of europes intelligence apparatus and military resources? Would we see a state of emergency declared across europe that sees the rights and freedoms of europeans thrown under the bus of 'enhanced security?'

 

I sure hope not but you have to wonder how they are going to switch gear and step this thing up toward their planned conclusion...

 

What better way of imposing ID microchipping and social credits scores then a new wave of 'terror' washing over the shocked and dumbed down european peoples who will be afraid to say anything lest they fall foul of 'hate crime' laws.

 

de ja vu?...i feel like we've been here before...nice acting by hilarly clinton there...the  hand over the mouth is a nice touch....like a bloodthirsty fullblown psychopath like her, the butcher of benghazi, would ever be genuinely shocked by that kind of footage....''we came, we saw, he died..''.***evil villain laugh***....look at all those serious faces....they're very serious people....be serious

 

20247788-0-image-a-58_1572190487102.jpg

 

 

Edited by muir

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, muir said:

 

20247788-0-image-a-58_1572190487102.jpg

 

 

just don't say there is a pattern here because the biger photo is taken from different angle....😁

 

there are days when i don't understand that masses don't see how its all scripted 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OPCW Losing Credibility As Even More Revelations Surface On Douma

By Caitlin Johnstone

 

During a recent BBC radio interview, award-winning journalist Jonathan Steele said that he attended a briefing by a new whistleblower from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) investigation into an alleged 2018 chemical attack in Douma, Syria, who claimed that the OPCW suppressed his findings which contradicted the organization’s official conclusion that a chlorine gas attack had taken place. This according to Steele is a second whistleblower coming forward on the OPCW’s Douma investigation, the first being the leaker of an Engineering Assessment document which surfaced this past May contradicting the OPCW’s official ballistics report which the organization hid from the public.

 

Indeed, the narrative manipulation campaign against the Syrian government is historically unprecedented in its depth and scale. From bizarre narrative management operations posing as rescue services, to CNN staging a fake, scripted interview featuring a seven year-old Syrian girl blaming Assad for a chemical weapons attack, to the BBC’s manipulative and transparently bogus Saving Syria’s Children documentary, to the US-centralized empire’s increasingly evident influence over the OPCW, we’re seeing evidence of a campaign to distort the public understanding of what’s going on in a foreign nation the likes of which we’ve never before seen.

read full piece here https://www.davidicke.com/article/557565/opcw-losing-credibility-even-revelations-surface-douma

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A few interesting developments this week...

 

So we have kanye west becoming a born again christian and saying that what is important is family, god and thinking for yourself. All great stuff and i hope he is for real but i'll remain a little wary after we have seen a few media insiders play a pied piper role for example we saw russel brand saying some interesting things before telling everyone to vote for red ed milliband in the election thereby clearly showing his marxist colours.

 

Then we had Milo on the alt right saying some good stuff but then concluding that everyone should combat islam which in essence feeds into the elites clash of civilisations agenda. So I'm half expecting to see some sort of twist to the kanye story but lets hope that he is for real and that he really has understood that as much as it is fun when you are young to stick two fingers up at the church and at family and at society the reality is that if people lose a spiritual purpose in life and discard community and family then everything falls apart pretty quick. kanye used to hang around with illuminati puppets like jay z but he could reach an audience that otherwise might not hear the message that he is now preaching; watch this space.

 

then we had liberal TV host bill maher saying on his show to an anti-vax guest that he thinks its plausible that vaccines are causing damage for example autism which could be a sign that we are about to have some disclosure on the autism link to vaccines and maher is preparing his progressive audience to find out that they have been wrong on this issue and that all those people they have savagely abused in debates over vaccines for all these years were simply telling them them truth...

 

Then we had obama telling his progressive audience to get over the whole woke thing because it is in effect a new form of puritanism where people are held to impossible standards and their careers written off on the basis of any single mistake. Perhaps the harm to progressive poster boy justin trudeau over his blackface-scandal has got progressives wondering if their character assassination tactics might just backfire onto them?

 

Then jeremy vine spoke about a 'spermogedden' on his radio show where the idea that it was endocrine disrupting chemicals that were the culprit for the halving of sperm counts in the west in just 40 years was mentioned. I do believe that such chemicals are having a gender bending effect but this has got me wondering if they are trying to divert attention away from the role of EMF's in the destruction of fertility and that they may wish to blame things on chemicals to disguise the damage they know is going to occur as they roll out 5G? just something to keep an eye on as we see more narrative pushed out by the corporate media narrative factory

 

Finally there was a piece in the telegraph about britain being in a 'cyber war' where someone stated that the new war was an online war of narratives aimed at shaping peoples perceptions so that clearly illustrates that the elites do indeed seek to mould perceptions through narratives and that they are in fact turning over military resources to that end....and we will be waiting ready to skewer the lies as they try to fool their own countrymen and women with state-funded propaganda

 

All  in all some strange developments though...

 

 

Edited by muir
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

David explains it as simply and clearly as it is possible to explain. If people can't grasp this then we are fucked because it doesn't get any clearer than this...

 

In this clip David is explaining through the use of dictionary definitions that we don't actually have 'capitalism' today we have cartelism where big cartels of corporations are formed that then subvert the market. Then when this causes problems for average people the authorities then offer socialism as a solution to the problem of what they would call 'capitalism' but which is really cartelism. Then the elites behind cartelism are revealed to be the same elites that WANT socialism because socialism allows them central control over everyone in a system in which it is even easier to control people and resources then under the cartelism system of subverted capitalism (ie what i would call STATE-capitalism)

 

From 5 mins 30 seconds david explains the elites are controlling both cartelism (what's falsely being called 'capitalism' today) AND socialism and then he goes straight into the definitions:

Empathy Not Isms - Ideology Is A Prison Cell - David Icke Dot-Connector Videocast

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, muir said:

David explains it as simply and clearly as it is possible to explain. If people can't grasp this then we are fucked because it doesn't get any clearer than this...

 

ep1-998x824.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, muir said:

 

ep1-998x824.jpg

 

Polls are now showing that the millenial generation have lost faith in 'capitalism'. We don 't really have capitalism we have, as David said in his recent podcast' cartelism but the point is that the elites are sowing a narrative that it is capitalism that has failed.This is to move public perception into a place where it is more favourable to socialism.

 

If we think about this whole brexit carry-on as well as the angst that trumps rise has caused amongst the progressives can we perceive all the chaos as a giant act of theatre to create a more militant youth who would more willingly rush headlong into the arms of socialism? Are the elites playing a long game here with all of this manufactured drama?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×